Consider the two-person zero-sum game in which two investors are each allowed to invest in a market with stocks ( X 1 , X 2 , ..., X m ) (sim) F , where X i (ge) 0. Each investor has one unit of capital. The goal is to achieve more money than one’s opponent. Allowable portfolio strategies are random investment policies B (in) R m , B (ge) 0 , E (sum) m i = 1 B i = 1. The payoff to player 1 for policy B 1 vs. B 2 is P { B t 1 X (ge) B t 2 X }. The optimal policy is shown to be B * = U b *, where U is a random variable uniformly distributed on [0, 2], and b * maximizes E ln b t X over b (ge) 0 , (sum) b i = 1 .Curiously, this competitively optimal investment policy b * is the same policy that achieves the maximum possible growth rate of capital in repeated independent investments (Breiman [Breiman, L. 1961. Optimal gambling systems for favorable games. Fourth Berkeley Symposium. 1 65--78.] and Kelly [Kelly, J. 1956. A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Tech. J. 917--926.]). Thus the immediate goal of outperforming another investor is perfectly compatible with maximizing the asymptotic rate of return.
[1]
J. B. Williams.
Speculation and the Carryover
,
1936
.
[2]
J. J. Kelly.
A new interpretation of information rate
,
1956
.
[3]
K. Arrow.
Essays in the theory of risk-bearing
,
1958
.
[4]
L. Breiman.
Optimal Gambling Systems for Favorable Games
,
1962
.
[5]
P. Samuelson.
General Proof that Diversification Pays
,
1967,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
[6]
N. H. Hakansson.,et al.
Optimal Growth Portfolios When Yields Are Serially Correlated
,
1970
.
[7]
N. H. Hakansson..
Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio Selection
,
1971,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
[8]
E. Thorp,et al.
The Capital Growth Model: An Empirical Investigation
,
1973,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
[9]
E. Thorp.
Portfolio Choice and the Kelly Criterion
,
1975
.