Peaking profiles for achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costs

How can dangerous interference with the climate system be avoided? Science can help decision-makers answer this political question. Earlier publications have focused on the probability of keeping global mean temperature change below certain thresholds by stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at particular levels. We compare the results of such “stabilization profiles” with a set of “peaking profiles” that reduce emissions further after stabilization and thus result in a concentration peak. Given the inertia in the climate system, stabilization profiles lead to ongoing warming beyond 2100 until the temperature reaches equilibrium. This warming partly can be prevented for peaking profiles. In this way, these profiles can increase the likelihood of achieving temperature thresholds by 10–20% compared with the likelihood for the associated stabilization profiles. Because the additional mitigation efforts and thus costs for peaking profiles lie mainly beyond 2100, peaking profiles achieving temperature thresholds with the same likelihood as the original stabilization profile, but at considerably lower cost (up to 40%), can be identified. The magnitude of the cost reductions depends on the assumptions on discounting. Peaking profiles and overshoot profiles with a limited overshoot may, in particular, play an important role in making more ambitious climate targets feasible.

[1]  Paul L. Lucas,et al.  The FAIR model: A tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments , 2005 .

[2]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing , 2006 .

[3]  Bill Hare,et al.  How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided? , 2006 .

[4]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases , 2007 .

[5]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change , 2004 .

[6]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[7]  Michael D Mastrandrea,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of "dangerous" climate change and emissions pathways. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Joel B. Smith,et al.  Long-term goals and post-2012 commitments: where do we go from here with climate policy? , 2005 .

[9]  Tsuneyuki Morita,et al.  Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment , 2002 .

[10]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Climate change impacts are sensitive to the concentration stabilization path. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  T. Wigley,et al.  Reasons for Larger Warming Projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report , 2002 .

[12]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[13]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .

[14]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Dangerous Climate Impacts and the Kyoto Protocol , 2002, Science.

[15]  Christian Azar,et al.  The Cost of Using Global Warming Potentials: Analysing the Trade off Between CO2, CH4 and N2O , 2006 .

[16]  Myles R. Allen,et al.  Alternatives to stabilization scenarios , 2006 .

[17]  Gary Yohe,et al.  To Hedge or Not Against an Uncertain Climate Future? , 2004, Science.

[18]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Avoiding dangerous climate change , 2006 .

[19]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: Costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increase , 2007 .

[20]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas Emissions Pathways to Meet Climate Targets , 2006 .

[21]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2004 , 2004 .

[22]  Michael D Mastrandrea,et al.  Probabilistic Integrated Assessment of "Dangerous" Climate Change , 2004, Science.

[23]  M. Saier,et al.  Climate Change, 2007 , 2007 .

[24]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[25]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity , 2001 .