The VC model: A universal pragmatic framework for GSS-enabled strategic planning

This paper has two broad objectives: (i) To develop a model of GSS-enabled strategic planning based on Habermas' theory of communicative action; (ii) To apply the model as a problem-structuring device to the conceptual problem of designing the strategic evaluation of a comprehensive urban plan. The model, known as the VC or validity-claims model, provides separate evaluative criteria for personal, social and technical aspects. The criteria for successful GSS-enabled strategic planning may be summarized as: "personal commitment validated by personal truthfulness or sincerity to a social consensus validated by rightness for informed action validated by objective truth". Detailed criteria (viz., goal, strategy, procedure, issues, and problems) are developed for each type of validity claim and matched to the technologies available. The result is a detailed brief for the design of GSS-enabled strategic urban planning interventions, including a sample agenda for the GSS-supported meeting and the GSS tools that will be employed.

[1]  J. Innes.  Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal , 1996 .

[2]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Structuring of Creative Processes using GSS: A Framework for Research , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. Mingers,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited : problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict , 1989 .

[4]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[5]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Issues and Concerns About Computer-Supported Meetings: The Facilitator's Perspective , 1996, MIS Q..

[6]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  P. Cilliers,et al.  Complexity and post-modernism: understanding complex systems , 1999 .

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A framework for communication support in group work with special reference to negotiation systems , 1995 .

[9]  David Crystal,et al.  The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language , 2012, Modern Language Review.

[10]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The unbounded mind , 1996 .

[11]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  The Habermas Reader , 1996 .

[12]  F. Ackermann.  Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems , 1996 .

[13]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[14]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Alan Altshuler,et al.  The City Planning Process: A Political Analysis , 1966 .

[16]  J. Mingers.  Towards an Appropriate Social Theory for Applied Systems Thinking: Critical Theory and Soft Systems Methodology , 1980 .

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[18]  J. J. Quinn,et al.  The Role of ‘Good Conversation’ In Strategic Control , 1996 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[20]  Colin Eden,et al.  SODA - The principles , 2001 .

[21]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[22]  Alan Altshuler.  THE GOALS OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING , 1965 .

[23]  J. Dutton,et al.  THE CREATION OF MOMENTUM FOR CHANGE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE DIAGNOSIS , 1987 .

[24]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[25]  J. Sheffield.  The effect of communication medium on negotiation performance , 1995 .

[26]  James F. Courtney,et al.  Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Unblocking brainstorms. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[29]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1993, MIS Q..

[30]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Information, Systems, And Information Systems , 1997 .

[31]  Colin Eden,et al.  SODA - journey making and mapping in practice , 2001 .

[32]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[33]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Performance of Computer-Mediated Groups during Idea Generation , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[35]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[36]  E. Jantsch.  The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[37]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[38]  R DennisAlan,et al.  Information technology to support electronic meetings , 1988 .

[39]  Jim Sheffield,et al.  Using Electronic Meeting Technology to Support Economic Policy Development in New Zealand: Short-Term Results , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  Group Support Systems for Strategic Planning , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  F. Ackermann.  Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems , 1996 .

[42]  Alan Altshuler,et al.  The city planning process : a political analysis. , 1969 .

[43]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Five Images of a Suburb: Perspectives on a New Urban Development , 1997 .

[44]  D. Barry,et al.  Strategy Retold: Toward a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse , 1997 .

[45]  R. Keat.  The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas , 1980 .

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Research-driven facilitation training for computer-supported environments , 1996 .

[48]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[49]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[50]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[51]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology: Mixing and Matching Methods , 2001 .