Model for Enhanced Data Management, Visualization, and Adaptation in e-learning

This paper describes the model for semantic annotation of educational materials and related concepts, as well as the structure of dependent services that extend the functionalities of current learning management systems (LMS). The goal of the model is to enable simple discovery, while allowing formulation and execu- tion of advanced search queries, augmented with visualizations of result sets and domain structure and adaptation of results according to students' interests. Several components were also implemented and their descriptions and other remarks are given following the description of the model. In modern educational systems, the final outcome of the learning process heavily depends on providing learn- ers with an access to the right information at the right time. An appropriate presentation and visualization of information can strongly influence the learning experience by allowing learners to explore an educational do- main instinctively, gaining a better insight into its structure. The main goal of this paper is to enhance data man- agement, visualization, and adaptation within an e-learning system. A model for semantic annotation of concepts present in learning management systems is presented, including the description of a structure of se- mantic applications that will utilize annotated resources to enhance data handling, browsing, searching, vi- sualization, and adaptivity. The developed solution is based around the principles of modularity and independency among components.

[1]  Stephen Downes Learning Objects: Resources For Distance Education Worldwide , 2001 .

[2]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Ontology languages for the Semantic Web , 2005 .

[3]  Brandon Muramatsu,et al.  Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata , 2002 .

[4]  Udo Winand,et al.  The sharable content object reference model (SCORM) - a critical review , 2002, International Conference on Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings..

[5]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[6]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  SpanningAspectRatioBank Easing FunctionS ArrayIn ColorIn Date Interpolator MatrixInterpola NumObjecPointI Rectang ISchedu Parallel Pause Scheduler Sequen Transition Transitioner Transiti Tween Co DelimGraphMLCon IData JSONCon DataField DataSc Dat DataSource Data DataUtil DirtySprite LineS RectSprite , 2011 .

[7]  Norma Banas,et al.  Visualization , 1968, Machine-mediated learning.

[8]  Stuart Weibel The State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative , 1999 .

[9]  HeerJeffrey,et al.  D3 Data-Driven Documents , 2011 .

[10]  Rory McGreal,et al.  Learning objects: A practical definition , 2004 .

[11]  Lars Marius Garshol,et al.  Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! Making Sense of it all , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Stuart Weibel,et al.  The State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative April 1999 , 1999, D Lib Mag..

[13]  Stuart Weibel,et al.  The Dublin Core: A Simple Content Description Model for Electronic Resources , 2005 .

[14]  Aba-Sah Dadzie,et al.  Approaches to visualising Linked Data: A survey , 2011, Semantic Web.

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[16]  Aurona Gerber,et al.  A Semantic Web Status Model , 2006 .

[17]  E. L. Harder,et al.  The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C).