Losing by Expanding

Third-generation activity theory (3GAT) has become a popular theoretical and methodological framework for writing studies, particularly in technical communication. 3GAT involves identifying an object, a material or problem that is cyclically transformed by collective activity. The object is the linchpin of analysis in the empirical case. Yet the notion of object has expanded methodologically and theoretically over time, making it difficult to reliably bound an empirical case. In response, this article outlines the expansion of the object, diagnoses this expansion, and proposes an alternate approach that constrains the object for case-study research in writing studies.

[1]  Huatong Sun,et al.  The Triumph of Users: Achieving Cultural Usability Goals With User Localization , 2006 .

[2]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Secret Sauce and Snake Oil: Writing Monthly Reports in a Highly Contingent Environment , 2010 .

[3]  Mark Zachry,et al.  Productive Tensions and the Regulatory Work of Genres in the Development of an Engineering Communication Workshop in a Transnational Corporation , 2010 .

[4]  Barbara Mirel,et al.  “Applied Constructivism” for User Documentation , 1998 .

[5]  Christina Haas,et al.  Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy , 1995 .

[6]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Guest Editor's Introduction: Technical Communication in the Age of Distributed Work , 2007 .

[7]  B. Nardi.  Objects of Desire: Power and Passion in Collaborative Activity , 2005 .

[8]  D. Russell,et al.  'Big Picture People Rarely Become Historians': Genre Systems and the Contradictions of General Education , 2003 .

[9]  Joseph Petraglia,et al.  Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction , 1996 .

[10]  B. Lomov.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1982 .

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Polycontextuality and Boundary Crossing in Expert Cognition: Learning and Problem Solving in Complex Work Activities. , 1995 .

[12]  V. Kaptelinin.  The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker , 2005 .

[13]  David Russell.  Writing in Multiple Contexts: Vygotskian CHAT Meets the Phenomenology of Genre , 2010 .

[14]  Harry Daniels,et al.  Learning and expanding with activity theory , 2009 .

[15]  Lynda Walsh,et al.  Constructive Interference: Wikis And Service Learning In The Technical Communication Classroom , 2010 .

[16]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Object of Activity and Individual Motivation , 2005 .

[17]  J. Avis.  Transformation or transformism: Engeström’s version of activity theory? , 2009 .

[18]  D. Russell.  Writing and Genre in Higher Education and Workplaces: A Review of Studies That Use Cultural--Historical Activity Theory , 1997 .

[19]  Lisa D. McNair,et al.  Activity Theory, Speech Acts, and the ‘‘Doctrine of Infelicity’’: Connecting Language and Technology in Globally Networked Learning Environments , 2010 .

[20]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Mundane tool or object of affection?: the rise and fall of the Postal Buddy , 1995 .

[21]  C. Bazerman.  Traditions of writing research , 2010 .

[22]  Peter H. Sawchuk,et al.  Critical Perspectives on Activity: Explorations Across Education, Work, and Everyday Life , 2006 .

[23]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Placeless Organizations: Collaborating for Transformation , 2007 .

[24]  D. Russell,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: Uses of Activity Theory in Written Communication Research , 2009 .

[25]  Huiling Ding,et al.  The Use of Cognitive and Social Apprenticeship to Teach a Disciplinary Genre Initiation of Graduate Students Into NIH Grant Writing , 2008 .

[26]  Nick Peim,et al.  Activity theory and ontology , 2009 .

[27]  Deirdre Martin,et al.  Critical perspectives on activity theory , 2009 .

[28]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies , 2010 .

[29]  Ellen Tove Christiansen,et al.  Tamed by a rose: computers as tools in human activity , 1995 .

[30]  Y. Engeström,et al.  New Forms of Learning in Co-Configuration Work. , 2004 .

[31]  Ritva Engeström,et al.  Voice as communicative action , 1995 .

[32]  Stefano De Paoli,et al.  My Life as a Night Elf Priest. An Antropological Account of World of Warcraft. , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[33]  David Bakhurst,et al.  Reflections on activity theory , 2009 .

[34]  Barbara Mirel,et al.  Interaction Design for Complex Problem Solving: Developing Useful and Usable Software , 2003 .

[35]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[36]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[37]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: The Future of Activity Theory: A Rough Draft , 2009 .

[38]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor‐network theory as approaches to studying innovations , 1999 .

[39]  Sampsa Hyysalo,et al.  Objects and Motives in a Product Design Process , 2005 .

[40]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Articulating User Needs in Collaborative Design: Towards an Activity-Theoretical Approach , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[41]  Brad Mehlenbacher,et al.  Triangulating communication design: emerging models for theory and practice , 2007, SIGDOC '07.

[42]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[43]  Dorothy Holland,et al.  Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming , 1995 .

[44]  A. Bruni,et al.  Knowing in a System of Fragmented Knowledge , 2007 .

[45]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Object Construction and Networks in Research Work: , 1998 .

[46]  L. Varpio.  Mapping the Genres of Healthcare Information Work: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Interactions Between Oral, Paper, and Electronic Forms of Communication , 2006 .

[47]  Ėvalʹd Vasilʹevich Ilʹenkov.  The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx's Capital , 2008 .

[48]  Anne Edwards,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: From the Systemic to the Relational: Relational Agency and Activity Theory , 2009 .

[49]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Pursuing an Evolving Object: A Case Study in Object Formation and Identification , 2002 .

[50]  R. Miettinen,et al.  Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change , 2005 .

[51]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[52]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[53]  Anthony Debons,et al.  The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[54]  Charles Heckscher,et al.  The firm as a collaborative community : reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy , 2009 .

[55]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[56]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[57]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Interprofessional communication and medical error: a reframing of research questions and approaches. , 2008, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[58]  Anthony Paré,et al.  Learning in two communities: the challenge for universities and workplaces , 2004 .

[59]  Lee M. Sherlock.  Genre, Activity, and Collaborative Work and Play in World of Warcraft , 2009 .

[60]  Kristin Pickering.  Student Ethos in the Online Technical Communication Classroom: Diverse Voices , 2009 .

[61]  David Russell,et al.  Activity Theory and Its Implications for Writing Instruction , 2012 .

[62]  Christina Haas,et al.  Research in Activity: , 2005 .

[63]  Michael Young,et al.  From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction , 2003 .

[64]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[65]  D. Russell.  Rethinking Genre in School and Society , 1997 .

[66]  Amy D. Propen,et al.  Understanding Genre through the Lens of Advocacy: The Rhetorical Work of the Victim Impact Statement , 2010 .

[67]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Interactive expertise : studies in distributed working intelligence , 1992 .

[68]  Reijo Miettinen.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: Contradictions of High-Technology Capitalism and the Emergence of New Forms of Work , 2009 .

[69]  Laura Seppänen,et al.  Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. , 2003 .

[70]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Tracing Genres through Organizations: A Sociocultural Approach to Information Design , 2003 .

[71]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  When Management Becomes Personal: 1 An Activity-Theoretic Analysis of Palm™ Technologies 2 , 2003 .

[72]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing , 2003 .

[73]  C. Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/culture/power , 1994 .

[74]  William Hart-Davidson,et al.  Chains and ecologies: methodological notes toward a communicative-mediational model of technologically mediated writing , 2006, SIGDOC '06.

[75]  C. Bazerman,et al.  Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research From Activity Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[76]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[77]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning, working and imagining : twelve studies in activity theory , 1990 .

[78]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[79]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From Well-Bounded Ethnographies to Intervening in Mycorrhizae Activities , 2006 .

[80]  Seth Chaiklin,et al.  Activity Theory and Social Practice , 1999 .

[81]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Knotworking to Create Collaborative Intentionality Capital in Fluid Organizational Fields , 2005 .

[82]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  An Activity Theory Analysis of Differences in the Cultures of Two Engineering Firms , 2001 .

[83]  H. Martin,et al.  Equal treatment under the law , 2004, Nature.

[84]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Pseudotransactionality, Activity Theory, and Professional Writing Instruction. , 1996 .

[85]  Natasha Artemeva,et al.  Toward a Unified Social Theory of Genre Learning , 2008 .

[86]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[87]  Barbara Mirel.  Interaction Design for Complex Problem Solving , 2003 .

[88]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[89]  Katsuhiro Yamazumi.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: Expansive Agency in Multi-Activity Collaboration , 2009 .

[90]  Bart Victor,et al.  Invented Here: Maximizing Your Organization's Internal Growth and Profitability , 1998 .

[91]  Colin G. Ellard,et al.  Context and consciousness , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[92]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[93]  James R. Beniger.  The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society , 1986 .

[94]  G. Rückriem,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: Digital Technology and Mediation: A Challenge to Activity Theory , 2009 .

[95]  Ėvalʹd Vasilʹevich Ilʹenkov,et al.  Dialectical logic : essays on its history and theory , 1977 .

[96]  Clay Spinuzzi.  Network: Theorizing Knowledge Work in Telecommunications , 2008 .

[97]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach , 2003 .

[98]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[99]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Enriching the Theory of Expansive Learning: Lessons From Journeys Toward Coconfiguration , 2007 .

[100]  Kristin Walker.  Activity Systems and Conflict Resolution in an Online Professional Communication Course , 2004 .

[101]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  NetWORKers and their Activity in Intensional Networks , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[102]  M. Cole,et al.  Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations , 1976 .

[103]  Lisa D. McNair,et al.  Teaching Technical Communication in an Era of Distributed Work: A Case Study of Collaboration Between U.S. and Swedish Students , 2007 .

[104]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Look Who’s Talking , 2006 .