The Message or the Messenger? Inferring Virality and Diffusion Structure from Online Petition Signature Data

Goel et al. [14] examined diffusion data from Twitter to conclude that online petitions are shared more virally than other types of content. Their definition of structural virality, which measures the extent to which diffusion follows a broadcast model or is spread person to person (virally), depends on knowing the topology of the diffusion cascade. But often the diffusion structure cannot be observed directly. We examined time-stamped signature data from the Obama White House’s We the People petition platform. We developed measures based on temporal dynamics that, we argue, can be used to infer diffusion structure as well as the more intrinsic notion of virality sometimes known as infectiousness. These measures indicate that successful petitions are likely to be higher in both intrinsic and structural virality than unsuccessful petitions are. We also investigate threshold effects on petition signing that challenge simple contagion models, and report simulations for a theoretical model that are consistent with our data.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Scott Wright,et al.  ‘Success’ and online political participation: The case of Downing Street E-petitions , 2016 .

[4]  Peter John,et al.  How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  M. J. Billington,et al.  Goal-guided learning from text: inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Tracking information epidemics in blogspace , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[7]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[9]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Goal gradient in helping behavior , 2013 .

[11]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[12]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Modeling the Rise in Internet-based Petitions , 2013, ArXiv.

[14]  E. A. Locke Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[15]  David Lazer,et al.  #Bigbirds Never Die: Understanding Social Dynamics of Emergent Hashtags , 2013, ICWSM.

[16]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[17]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[18]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content , 2009, EC '09.

[19]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Social Networks Applied , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[21]  Rajesh Bagchi,et al.  The Effect of Goal Visualization on Goal Pursuit: Implications for Consumers and Managers: , 2011 .

[22]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[23]  Andreas Jungherr,et al.  The Political Click : Political Participation through E-Petitions in Germany , 2010 .

[24]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[25]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[26]  A. Bandura,et al.  Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation , 1986, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[27]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[28]  Minjung Koo,et al.  The Small-Area Hypothesis: Effects of Progress Monitoring on Goal Adherence , 2012 .

[29]  Eric Sun,et al.  Gesundheit! Modeling Contagion through Facebook News Feed , 2009, ICWSM.

[30]  Ran Kivetz,et al.  The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention , 2006 .

[31]  C. L. Hull The rat's speed-of-locomotion gradient in the approach to food. , 1934 .

[32]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[33]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street website , 2013, WebSci.

[34]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of Influence in a Recommendation Network , 2006, PAKDD.

[35]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  The structure of online diffusion networks , 2012, EC '12.

[36]  D. Watts,et al.  Social Influence, Binary Decisions and Collective Dynamics , 2008 .

[37]  D. Watts,et al.  A generalized model of social and biological contagion. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[39]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[40]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Predicting Successful Memes Using Network and Community Structure , 2014, ICWSM.

[41]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[42]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  A simple generative model of collective online behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[44]  Stéphane Reissfelder,et al.  Social information and political participation on the internet: an experiment , 2011, European Political Science Review.

[45]  David P. Myatt,et al.  Innovation Diffusion in Heterogeneous Populations: Contagion, Social Influence, and Social Learning , 2009 .

[46]  Stéphane Reissfelder,et al.  Leadership without Leaders? Starters and Followers in Online Collective Action , 2013, ArXiv.

[47]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Charlton D. McIlwain Analytic Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy , 2018, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews.