“What is fair for you?” Judgments and decisions about fairness and Theory of Mind

Theory of Mind (ToM) is involved in decision making in strategic games with adults, while its results with children are still controversial, probably because the literature to date has not directly assessed children's concept of fairness. The goal of this research is to investigate what constitutes fairness across different age groups (children aged seven, eight and nine years) by assessing both their judgements and their decisions concerning the offers made by a social partner and then to relate this to ToM understanding by using second-order false-belief tasks. Results show that, across age groups, the concept of fairness evolves from divisions in one's advantage towards those of equality; although ToM is not related to the concept of fairness, it plays a role in the strategic behaviour that orients children to accept more equal divisions and to reject hyperfair divisions.

[1]  Mentalizzazione e competenza sociale. La comprensione della falsa credenza nello sviluppo normale e patologico. , 2005 .

[2]  J. Benenson,et al.  Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game , 2007 .

[3]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Fairness and intentionality in children’s decision-making , 2010 .

[5]  Annalisa Valle,et al.  Theory of mind and language in developmental contexts , 2007 .

[6]  Helen Tager-Flusberg,et al.  Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs , 1994 .

[7]  Masanori Takezawa,et al.  To give or not to give: children's and adolescents' sharing and moral negotiations in economic decision situations. , 2008, Child development.

[8]  Francesca Baglio,et al.  Theory of mind in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: an FMRI study. , 2012, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[9]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The sources of normativity: young children's awareness of the normative structure of games. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[10]  Ilaria Castelli,et al.  Mentalization in communicative and socio-relational interactions: considerations about a theory-of-mind modelling , 2009 .

[11]  Y. Hanoch,et al.  Preschoolers' allocations in the dictator game : The role of moral emotions , 2010 .

[12]  James K Rilling,et al.  The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Astington,et al.  Theory of mind and epistemological development: the relation between children's second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence , 2002 .

[14]  Y. Hanoch,et al.  When Child Development Meets Economic Game Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Investigating Social Development , 2008, Human Development.

[15]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. , 2006, Child development.

[16]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[17]  Katia M. Harlé,et al.  Expectations and outcome: the role of proposer features in the Ultimatum Game , 2011 .

[18]  L. Surian,et al.  The developmental roots of fairness: infants' reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. , 2011, Developmental science.

[19]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults , 1998 .

[20]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[21]  M. Tomasello,et al.  What's in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  David F. Sally,et al.  The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness , 2006 .

[23]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees Are Rational Maximizers in an Ultimatum Game , 2007, Science.

[24]  Patrick J. Leman,et al.  Children's and adolescents' decisions about sharing money with others , 2009 .

[25]  H. Wimmer,et al.  “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children ☆ , 1985 .

[26]  C. Moore Fairness in Children's Resource Allocation Depends on the Recipient , 2009, Psychological science.

[27]  Wouter van den Bos,et al.  Fairness considerations: increasing understanding of intentionality during adolescence. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  Margery Lucas,et al.  Fair game: The intuitive economics of resource exchange in four-year olds. , 2008 .

[29]  Robert Hoffmann,et al.  Adolescent-Adult Interactions and Culture in the Ultimatum Game , 2006 .

[30]  M. Alberoni,et al.  Mapping levels of theory of mind in Alzheimer's disease: A preliminary study , 2011, Aging & mental health.

[31]  H. Wellman,et al.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.

[32]  M. Siegal,et al.  Where to look first for children's knowledge of false beliefs , 1991, Cognition.

[33]  C. Bicchieri,et al.  Behaving as Expected: Public Information and Fairness Norms , 2008 .

[34]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  S. Gächter Behavioral Game Theory , 2008, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[36]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[37]  A. Bombi,et al.  The Child's Construction of Economics , 1988 .

[38]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  The Impact of Exchange Context on the Activation of Equity in Ultimatum Games , 2000 .

[39]  Michaela Gummerum,et al.  A stage for the rational tail of the emotional dog: Roles of moral reasoning in group decision making , 2006 .

[40]  B. Rockenbach,et al.  Egalitarianism in young children , 2008, Nature.

[41]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Bargaining by Children , 2003 .

[42]  M. Sutter,et al.  Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age , 2007 .