Effective quorum quenching bacteria dose for anti-fouling strategy in membrane bioreactors utilizing fixed-sheet media

Abstract Quorum quenching (QQ) has been recognized as an emerging anti-biofouling strategy for membrane bioreactors (MBRs), but studies on effective QQ bacterial doses are needed. Therefore, in this study, the QQ efficacy for sheet-type media containing different amounts of QQ bacteria (i.e., Rhodococcus sp. BH4) with respect to biofouling control during MBR treatment of synthetic and real municipal wastewaters was investigated. The QQ sheets with well-embedded BH4 bacteria were distinctly effective at alleviating biofouling, but their efficacy was highly dependent on the QQ bacterial dose. The activity of the QQ sheet increased with the QQ bacterial density and its pseudo-first order rate constant reached 3.52 h−1 with 100 mg BH4 per liter of reactor volume. No QQ activity loss occurred with long-term use of the QQ sheets. The relationship between QQ dose and fouling delay had a strong, linear correlation. Fouling retardation was more pronounced with real wastewater because it had less biofouling propensity owing to its inferior organics and nutrients. In fact, the MBRs fed with real wastewater experienced a dramatic decrease in extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) content responsible for biofouling. QQ suppressed the EPS secretion leading to fouling mitigation, but with no impact on biological treatment performances.

[1]  I. Koyuncu,et al.  Biofouling control based on bacterial quorum quenching with a new application: Rotary microbial carrier frame , 2017 .

[2]  L. Dvořák,et al.  The impact of different operating conditions on membrane fouling and EPS production. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[3]  Hyun-Suk Oh,et al.  Crossing the Border between Laboratory and Field: Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Anti-Biofouling Strategy in an MBR. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[5]  Hyun-Suk Oh,et al.  Biofouling control with bead-entrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors: physical and biological effects. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[7]  Sang-Ryoung Kim,et al.  Macroencapsulation of quorum quenching bacteria by polymeric membrane layer and its application to MBR for biofouling control , 2015 .

[8]  Jung-Kee Lee,et al.  Application of quorum quenching bacteria entrapping sheets to enhance biofouling control in a membrane bioreactor with a hollow fiber module , 2017 .

[9]  Yalei Zhang,et al.  Dynamic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: Operation, critical flux, and dynamic membrane structure , 2014 .

[10]  Qiang He,et al.  Optimization of membrane fouling process for mustard tuber wastewater treatment in an anoxic-oxic biofilm-membrane bioreactor , 2016 .

[11]  J. A. Mueller,et al.  Aeration: principles and practice. , 2002 .

[12]  Zhiwei Wang,et al.  Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2009, Water research.

[13]  S. Hermanowicz,et al.  Effect of quorum quenching on the reactor performance, biofouling and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors. , 2013, Water research.

[14]  Seoktae Kang,et al.  Mitigated membrane fouling in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR) , 2006 .

[15]  Jung-Kee Lee,et al.  Effect of the Shape and Size of Quorum-Quenching Media on Biofouling Control in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. , 2016, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[16]  Hang-Sik Shin,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review. , 2017, Water research.

[17]  Mi-Hyung Kim,et al.  Fouling characteristics in pure oxygen MBR process according to MLSS concentrations and COD loadings , 2013 .

[18]  Haluk Beyenal,et al.  Quorum sensing: a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  K. Choo,et al.  Hybridization of physical cleaning and quorum quenching to minimize membrane biofouling and energy consumption in a membrane bioreactor. , 2014, Water research.

[20]  Chung-Hak Lee,et al.  Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Jungbae Kim,et al.  Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[23]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Mechanism of calcium mitigating membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. , 2009, Journal of environmental sciences.

[25]  L. Chabaliná,et al.  Influence of EPS and MLSS concentrations on mixed liquor physical parameters of two membrane bioreactors , 2012 .

[26]  S. Rice,et al.  Community quorum sensing signalling and quenching: microbial granular biofilm assembly , 2015, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes.

[27]  C. Yoo,et al.  Interpretation and diagnosis of fouling progress in membrane bioreactor plants using a periodic pattern recognition method , 2017, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering.

[28]  D. Jenkins,et al.  The effect of organic loading on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. , 2006, Water research.

[29]  K. Choo,et al.  Biofouling control: Bacterial quorum quenching versus chlorination in membrane bioreactors. , 2016, Water research.

[30]  K. Choo,et al.  More Efficient Media Design for Enhanced Biofouling Control in a Membrane Bioreactor: Quorum Quenching Bacteria Entrapping Hollow Cylinder. , 2016, Environmental Science and Technology.

[31]  Zhiwei Wang,et al.  Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation : Membrane foulant and gel layer characterization , 2008 .

[32]  Ki-Baek Lee,et al.  Microbial population dynamics and proteomics in membrane bioreactors with enzymatic quorum quenching , 2013, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[33]  Yung-Hua Li,et al.  Quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Streptococcal infections. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  S. Judd,et al.  Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. , 2012, Water research.

[35]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. , 2005, Trends in microbiology.

[36]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[37]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system -- the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling , 1998 .

[38]  G. Peterson,et al.  A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable. , 1977, Analytical biochemistry.

[39]  Hyun-Suk Oh,et al.  Biofouling inhibition in MBR by Rhodococcus sp. BH4 isolated from real MBR plant , 2013, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.