accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. BOUNDARY SPANNING ACTIVITIES OF CORPORATE HQ EXECUTIVES INSIGHTS FROM A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

What are the boundary spanning activities undertaken by the Corporate Headquarters (HQ) executives of a Multinational Corporation? We address this question through a five-year longitudinal case study of one company as it shifted from a traditional HQ in one location, to a dual HQ in two locations, to a virtual HQ split across multiple locations. By observing how HQ executives prioritized their time over the course of this transition, we identified four generic boundary spanning activities: two (spearheading and facilitating) focused on making connections across boundaries, two (reconciling and lubricating) focused on overcoming differences in worldview across boundaries. By considering these activities together, and how they vary in importance over time, we show how each boundary spanning activity adds value to the MNC and improves the effectiveness of the internal and external network. An important feature of our study is that we operationalize boundary spanning at the activity level, i.e., in terms of the specific actions taken by corporate HQ executives, to provide a more granular understanding of how boundary spanning works in practice.

[1]  H. Perlmutter.  The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation , 2017 .

[2]  Y. Doz,et al.  An Approach to Strategic Control in MNCs , 2017 .

[3]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations , 2017 .

[4]  L. F. Monteiro,et al.  How Does Performance Feedback Affect Boundary Spanning in Multinational Corporations? Insights from Technology Scouts , 2017 .

[5]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Boundary Capabilities in MNCs: Knowledge Transformation for Creative Solution Development , 2017 .

[6]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Rethinking the role of the centre in the multidivisional firm: A retrospective , 2017 .

[7]  Florian A. A. Becker-Ritterspach,et al.  Politics and Power in Multinational Companies: Integrating the International Business and Organization Studies Perspectives , 2016 .

[8]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  The Network Firm as a Political Coalition , 2016 .

[9]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How Do Firms Manage Strategic Dualities? A Process Perspective , 2016 .

[10]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[11]  Björn Ambos,et al.  Changes at Corporate Headquarters: Review, Integration and Future Research , 2015 .

[12]  L. F. Monteiro.  Selective attention and the initiation of the global knowledge-sourcing process in multinational corporations , 2015 .

[13]  David J. Collis,et al.  The Corporate Headquarters in the Contemporary Corporation: Advancing a Multimarket Firm Perspective , 2015 .

[14]  Tom J. M. Mom,et al.  Why Do Multinational Corporations Relocate Core Parts of Their Corporate Headquarters Abroad , 2015 .

[15]  M. Reitzig,et al.  What’s ‘New’ About New Forms of Organizing? , 2013 .

[16]  R. Narula.  Exploring the paradox of competence‐creating subsidiaries : balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs , 2014 .

[17]  Marc Baaij,et al.  The role of headquarters–subsidiary geographic distance in strategic decisions by spatially disaggregated headquarters , 2013 .

[18]  Björn Ambos,et al.  Parenting Advantage in the MNC: An Embeddedness Perspective on the Value Added by Headquarters , 2013 .

[19]  Tomi Laamanen,et al.  Cross-border relocations of headquarters in Europe , 2012 .

[20]  R. Mudambi.  Hierarchy, coordination, and innovation in the multinational enterprise , 2011 .

[21]  M. Tushman,et al.  External Communication and Project Performance: An Investigation Into the Role of Gatekeepers , 2011 .

[22]  Andreas Schotter,et al.  Performance effects of MNC headquarters-subsidiary conflict and the role of boundary spanners: The case of headquarter initiative rejection , 2011 .

[23]  M. Forsgren,et al.  Rationality vs ignorance: The role of MNE headquarters in subsidiaries’ innovation processes , 2011 .

[24]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Leveraging knowledge and competencies across space: The next frontier in international business , 2011 .

[25]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[26]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How Do New Ventures Evolve? An Inductive Study of Archetype Changes in Science-Based Ventures , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? , 2010 .

[28]  Björn Ambos,et al.  How Do MNC Headquarters Add Value? , 2010 .

[29]  William G. Egelhoff.  How the Parent Headquarters Adds Value to an MNC , 2010 .

[30]  Sarah Kaplan.  Cognition, Capabilities, and Incentives: Assessing Firm Response to the Fiber-Optic Revolution , 2008 .

[31]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters , 2008 .

[32]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing Power in the Multinational Corporation: How Low-Power Actors Gain Influence , 2008 .

[33]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† , 2008 .

[34]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups , 2008 .

[35]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[36]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[37]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[38]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Penguins, Camels, and Other Birds of a Feather: Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling , 2006 .

[40]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers , 2006 .

[41]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  WHY DO SOME MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS RELOCATE THEIR HEADQUARTERS OVERSEAS , 2006 .

[42]  X. Vives,et al.  Why and Where Do Headquarters Move? , 2005 .

[43]  David Obstfeld.  Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[44]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[45]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[46]  B. Clarysse,et al.  A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off , 2004 .

[47]  T. Kostova,et al.  Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro-Macro Model of its Formation , 2003 .

[48]  K. Wright.  Research notes , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[50]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[52]  José Santos,et al.  From global to metanational: how companies win in the knowledge economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[53]  G. Boocock.  Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm , 2000 .

[54]  E. Hollander.  Attention, Attention! , 2000, CNS Spectrums.

[55]  Sharon O'donnell,et al.  MANAGING FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES: AGENTS OF HEADQUARTERS, OR AN INTERDEPENDENT NETWORK? , 2000 .

[56]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[57]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[58]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Institutional Sources of Boundary-Spanning Structures: the Establishment of Investor Relations Departments in the Fortune 500 Industrials , 1999 .

[59]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[60]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy and parenting theory , 1998 .

[61]  Bruce A. Pasternack,et al.  The CENTERLESS CORPORATION: A NEW MODEL FOR TRANSFORMING YOUR ORGANIZATION FOR GROWTH AND PROSPERITY , 1998 .

[62]  H. Rao.  Part VII: Managing Reputation: Pursuing Everyday Excellence: The rise of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials , 1997 .

[63]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  On the Rationales of Corporate Headquarters , 1997 .

[64]  Refik Culpan.  The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation , 1997 .

[65]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: A REEXAMINATION OF RECENT EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[66]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[67]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms , 1995 .

[68]  J. Birkinshaw.  Is the country manager an endangered species , 1995 .

[69]  Thomas W. Malnight.  Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective , 1995 .

[70]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[71]  Mark H. Davis.  Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach , 1994 .

[72]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[73]  B. Golden.  The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[74]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[75]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[76]  Alfred D. Chandler.  The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm , 1991 .

[77]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[78]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Global strategic management: Impact on the new frontiers of strategy research , 1991 .

[79]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[80]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[81]  M. Miles,et al.  Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft , 1984 .

[82]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[83]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[84]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[85]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[86]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Boundary Spanning Roles and Organization Structure , 1977 .

[87]  J. D. Pozo-olano.  Multinational corporations. , 1974, Science.

[88]  Israel M. Kirzner,et al.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1974 .

[89]  D. Hickson.  Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1972 .

[90]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[91]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[92]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .