Choice and determinism: A test of Hrebiniak and Joyce's framework on strategy‐environment fit

This paper describes the first empirical test of Hrebiniak and Joyce'S innovative model of business-environment relations. Virtually all the literature prior to their Administrative Science Quarterly article (1985) assumes a zero-sum relationship between managerial choice and environmental determinism. In the Hrebiniak and Joyce framework the two are orthogonal, and environments where management and environment are both weak or both powerful are possible. We first look for evidence of Hrebiniak and Joyce'S environment typology in 52 manufacturing industries previously specified by Dess and Beard (1984). Next, we test their propositions of strategy-environment fit by classifying 146 firms into strategic groups, then evaluating each group in each environment. Our tests provide partial support for Hrebiniak and Joyce'S environment typology and for their contingent strategies. However, frequencies of firm location among the environments were highly skewed. These results suggest that strategy-environment fit may not be as critical as market-selection in the competitive success of firms.

[1]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[2]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[4]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Environments of Organizations , 1976 .

[5]  D. Schendel,et al.  A Simultaneous Equation Model of Corporate Strategy , 1978 .

[6]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[7]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[8]  Howard E. Aldrich.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[9]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[10]  D. Hambrick.  An Empirical Typology of Mature Industrial-Product Environments , 1983 .

[11]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Populations, Natural Selection, and Applied Organizational Science. , 1983 .

[12]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application , 1983 .

[13]  D. Hambrick.  High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach , 1983 .

[14]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[15]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[16]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[17]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[18]  W A Randolph,et al.  The fit between technology and structure as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. , 1985, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[19]  L. G. Hrebiniak,et al.  Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. , 1985 .

[20]  B. Chakravarthy.  Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[21]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[22]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[23]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  The Top Management Team: Key to Strategic Success , 1987 .