Forecasting intensive care unit demand during the COVID-19 pandemic: A spatial age-structured microsimulation model

Background The COVID-19 pandemic poses the risk of overburdening health care systems, and in particular intensive care units (ICUs). Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), ranging from wearing masks to (partial) lockdowns have been implemented as mitigation measures around the globe. However, especially severe NPIs are used with great caution due to their negative effects on the economy, social life and mental well-being. Thus, understanding the impact of the pandemic on ICU demand under alternative scenarios reflecting different levels of NPIs is vital for political decision-making on NPIs. Objective The aim is to support political decision-making by forecasting COVID-19-related ICU demand under alternative scenarios of COVID-19 progression reflecting different levels of NPIs. Substantial sub-national variation in COVID-19-related ICU demand requires a spatially disaggregated approach. This should not only take sub-national variation in ICU-relevant disease dynamics into account, but also variation in the population at risk including COVID-19-relevant risk characteristics (e.g. age), and factors mitigating the pandemic. The forecast provides indications for policy makers and health care stakeholders as to whether mitigation measures have to be maintained or even strengthened to prevent ICU demand from exceeding supply, or whether there is leeway to relax them. Methods We implement a spatial age-structured microsimulation model of the COVID-19 pandemic by extending the Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) framework. The model accounts for regional variation in population age structure and in spatial diffusion pathways. In a first step, we calibrate the model by applying a genetic optimization algorithm against hospital data on ICU patients with COVID-19. In a second step, we forecast COVID-19-related ICU demand under alternative scenarios of COVID 19 progression reflecting different levels of NPIs. We apply the model to Germany and provide state-level forecasts over a 2-month period, which can be updated daily based on latest data on the progression of the pandemic. Results To illustrate the merits of our model, we present here forecasts of ICU demand for different stages of the pandemic during 2020. Our forecasts for a quiet summer phase with low infection rates identified quite some variation in potential for relaxing NPIs across the federal states. By contrast, our forecasts during a phase of quickly rising infection numbers in autumn (second wave) suggested that all federal states should implement additional NPIs. However, the identified needs for additional NPIs varied again across federal states. In addition, our model suggests that during large infection waves ICU demand would quickly exceed supply, if there were no NPIs in place to contain the virus. Conclusion Our results provide evidence for substantial spatial variation in (1) the effect of the pandemic on ICU demand, and (2) the potential and need for NPI adjustments at different stages of the pandemic. Forecasts with our spatial age-structured microsimulation model allow to take this spatial variation into account. The model is programmed in R and can be applied to other countries, provided that reliable data on the number of ICU patients infected with COVID-19 are available at sub-national level.

[1]  Anonymous Correction: Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study , 2020, PLoS Medicine.

[2]  M. Nöthen,et al.  Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV2 in a super-spreading event in Germany , 2020, Nature Communications.

[3]  Ihme COVID-19 Forecasting Team Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States , 2020, Nature medicine.

[4]  H. Nair,et al.  The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[5]  A. Blom,et al.  COVID‐19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences , 2020, European policy analysis.

[6]  Y. Teo,et al.  Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe , 2020, The Lancet.

[7]  Nikos Kapitsinis,et al.  The underlying factors of the COVID‐19 spatially uneven spread. Initial evidence from regions in nine EU countries , 2020, Regional Science Policy & Practice.

[8]  K. Jöckel,et al.  Excess mortality due to COVID-19 in Germany , 2020, Journal of Infection.

[9]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications , 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[10]  A. Ebigbo,et al.  Bettenkapazitätssteuerung in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie , 2020, Der Anaesthesist.

[11]  H. Messmann,et al.  [Bed capacity management in times of the COVID-19 pandemic : A simulation-based prognosis of normal and intensive care beds using the descriptive data of the University Hospital Augsburg]. , 2020, Der Anaesthesist.

[12]  M. Hauptmann,et al.  Clinical course and factors associated with outcomes among 1904 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Germany: an observational study , 2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

[13]  Martin A. Tanner,et al.  Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed , 2020, International Journal of Forecasting.

[14]  R. Busse,et al.  Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study , 2020, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

[15]  Enzo Weber,et al.  COVID-19: how much unemployment was caused by the shutdown in Germany? , 2020 .

[16]  M. Teufel,et al.  Increased generalized anxiety, depression and distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Germany , 2020, Journal of public health.

[17]  A. Londei,et al.  Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[18]  B. Singer,et al.  The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  C. Michelsen,et al.  [Spatial Interregional Spread of COVID-19 Through Commuter Interdependence]. , 2020, Wirtschaftsdienst.

[20]  D. Brockmann,et al.  COVID-19 lockdown induces disease-mitigating structural changes in mobility networks , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Ganna Rozhnova,et al.  Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study , 2020, PLoS medicine.

[22]  M. Tanner,et al.  A case study in model failure? COVID-19 daily deaths and ICU bed utilisation predictions in New York state , 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[23]  J. Aburto,et al.  Besides population age structure, health and other demographic factors can contribute to understanding the COVID-19 burden , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  X. Ben,et al.  Assessing the impact of coordinated COVID-19 exit strategies across Europe , 2020, Science.

[25]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe , 2020, Nature.

[26]  N. G. Davies,et al.  Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[27]  Michèle Tertilt,et al.  The Short-Run Macro Implications of School and Child-Care Closures , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  C. Michelsen,et al.  Räumliche Ausbreitung von COVID-19 durch interregionale Verflechtungen , 2020, Wirtschaftsdienst (Hamburg, Germany : 1949).

[29]  Zack W. Almquist,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity can lead to substantial local variations in COVID-19 timing and severity , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  E. Zagheni,et al.  The differential impact of physical distancing strategies on social contacts relevant for the spread of COVID-19 , 2020, medRxiv.

[31]  C. Buckee,et al.  Wrong but Useful - What Covid-19 Epidemiologic Models Can and Cannot Tell Us. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Daniela Perrotta,et al.  Behaviors and attitudes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a cross-national Facebook survey , 2020, medRxiv.

[33]  K. Jöckel,et al.  Estimated Use of Intensive Care Beds Due to COVID-19 in Germany Over Time. , 2020, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[34]  Stephen E. Chick,et al.  ICU capacity management during the COVID-19 pandemic using a process simulation , 2020, Intensive Care Medicine.

[35]  Christian L. Althaus,et al.  Dynamic interventions to control COVID-19 pandemic: a multivariate prediction modelling study comparing 16 worldwide countries , 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[36]  Shuo Wang,et al.  An epidemiological modelling approach for COVID-19 via data assimilation , 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[37]  M. Myrskylä,et al.  A demographic scaling model for estimating the total number of COVID-19 infections , 2020, medRxiv.

[38]  Nicholas P Jewell,et al.  Predictive Mathematical Models of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Underlying Principles and Value of Projections. , 2020, JAMA.

[39]  Matthias an der Heiden,et al.  Schätzung der aktuellen Entwicklung der SARS-CoV-2- Epidemie in Deutschland – Nowcasting , 2020 .

[40]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters , 2020, Environmental Research.

[41]  J. Carcione,et al.  A Simulation of a COVID-19 Epidemic Based on a Deterministic SEIR Model , 2020, Frontiers in Public Health.

[42]  Johannes Zierenberg,et al.  Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions , 2020, Science.

[43]  C. Faes,et al.  Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on symptom onset data, March 2020 , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[44]  S. Eubank,et al.  Commentary on Ferguson, et al., “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand” , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[45]  Alyson A. van Raalte,et al.  Monitoring trends and differences in COVID-19 case-fatality rates using decomposition methods: Contributions of age structure and age-specific fatality , 2020, medRxiv.

[46]  C. Murray Forecasting COVID-19 impact on hospital bed-days, ICU-days, ventilator-days and deaths by US state in the next 4 months , 2020, medRxiv.

[47]  Carl A. B. Pearson,et al.  The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[48]  Matthias an der Heiden,et al.  Modellierung von Beispielszenarien der SARS-CoV-2-Epidemie 2020 in Deutschland , 2020 .

[49]  J. Dowd,et al.  Demographic science aids in understanding the spread and fatality rates of COVID-19 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Eric H. Y. Lau,et al.  Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[51]  Ruiyun Li,et al.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) , 2020, Science.

[52]  R. Trimble COVID-19 Dashboard , 2020 .

[53]  Guillermo J. Lagos-Grisales,et al.  Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease.

[54]  Zunyou Wu,et al.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2020, JAMA.

[55]  Yang Liu,et al.  Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[56]  Fred Brauer,et al.  Mathematical epidemiology: Past, present, and future , 2017, Infectious Disease Modelling.

[57]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  On the Use of Human Mobility Proxies for Modeling Epidemics , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  Luca Scrucca,et al.  GA: A Package for Genetic Algorithms in R , 2013 .

[59]  P. Ferdinande,et al.  The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe , 2012, Intensive Care Medicine.

[60]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  A distributed procedure for computing stochastic expansions with Mathematica , 2010, 1009.5556.