In-home monitoring of persons with dementia: Ethical guidelines for technology research and development

Innovative technologies are rapidly emerging that offer caregivers the support and means to assist older adults with cognitive impairment to continue living “at home.” Technology research and development efforts applied to older adults with dementia invoke special grant review and institutional review board concerns, to ensure not only safe but also ethically appropriate interventions. Evidence is emerging, however, that tensions are growing between innovators and reviewers. Reviewers with antitechnology biases are in a position to stifle needed innovation. Technology developers who fail to understand the clinical and caregiving aspects of dementia may design applications that are not in alignment with users' capabilities. To bridge this divide, we offer an analysis of the ethical issues surrounding home monitoring, a model framework, and ethical guidelines for technology research and development for persons with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.

[1]  J. Karlawish,et al.  What is the Quality of the Reporting of Research Ethics in Publications of Nursing Home Research? , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  R. Z. Shaul.  Reviewing the reviewers: the vague accountability of research ethics committees , 2002, Critical care.

[3]  J. Karlawish.  Research involving cognitively impaired adults. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  L. Roberts,et al.  An Invitation for Medical Educators to Focus on Ethical and Policy Issues in Research and Scholarly Practice , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  A R Jonsen,et al.  Do no harm. , 1978, Annals of internal medicine.

[6]  Elsa Marziali,et al.  A Systematic Review of Practice Standards and Research Ethics in Technology-Based Home Health Care Intervention Programs for Older Adults , 2005, Journal of aging and health.

[7]  O. Ybarra,et al.  Disconfirmation of person expectations by older and younger adults: implications for social vigilance. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  K. Bauer,et al.  Home-Based Telemedicine: A Survey of Ethical Issues , 2001, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[9]  Vijaya L. Melnick,et al.  Alzheimer’s Dementia , 1985, Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society.

[10]  Reg,et al.  Empirical Research on Informed Consent with the Cognitively Impaired , 2022 .

[11]  S. Eckstein.  The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research , 2003 .

[12]  Pierre N Tariot,et al.  What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research? , 2005, Neurology.

[13]  D. Mahoney.  Vigilance. Evolution and definition for caregivers of family members with Alzheimer's disease. , 2003, Journal of gerontological nursing.