Human Neuroscience Hypothesis and Theory Article the Scientific Study of Inspiration in the Creative Process: Challenges and Opportunities

Inspiration is a motivational state that compels individuals to bring ideas into fruition. Creators have long argued that inspiration is important to the creative process, but until recently, scientists have not investigated this claim. In this article, we review challenges to the study of creative inspiration, as well as solutions to these challenges afforded by theoretical and empirical work on inspiration over the past decade. First, we discuss the problem of definitional ambiguity, which has been addressed through an integrative process of construct conceptualization. Second, we discuss the challenge of how to operationalize inspiration. This challenge has been overcome by the development and validation of the Inspiration Scale (IS), which may be used to assess trait or state inspiration. Third, we address ambiguity regarding how inspiration differs from related concepts (creativity, insight, positive affect) by discussing discriminant validity. Next, we discuss the preconception that inspiration is less important than “perspiration” (effort), and we review empirical evidence that inspiration and effort both play important—but different—roles in the creative process. Finally, with many challenges overcome, we argue that the foundation is now set for a new generation of research focused on neural underpinnings. We discuss potential challenges to and opportunities for the neuroscientific study of inspiration. A better understanding of the biological basis of inspiration will illuminate the process through which creative ideas “fire the soul,” such that individuals are compelled to transform ideas into products and solutions that may benefit society.

[1]  P. Silvia,et al.  Creativity and Mental Illness , 2021, Creativity and Innovation.

[2]  Lao Juan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring Instructors' Attitudes toward Concept-Based or Reform-Oriented Teaching of Introductory Statistics in the Health and Behavioral Sciences , 2010, 1007.3219.

[3]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Creative Insight: The Social Dimension of a Solitary Moment , 2014 .

[4]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  EEG Methods for the Psychological Sciences , 2013 .

[5]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Personality and creativity: the Dual Pathway to Creativity model and a research agenda , 2013 .

[6]  R. Stark,et al.  Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Gaining Insight Into the “Aha” Experience , 2010 .

[8]  A. Dietrich,et al.  A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Gregory J. Feist The Function of Personality in Creativity , 2010, The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity.

[10]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: how mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface. , 2010, Psychological review.

[11]  A. Elliot,et al.  Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[12]  Christian Dobel,et al.  A Fast Neural Signature of Motivated Attention to Consumer Goods Separates the Sexes , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Scott E. Cassidy,et al.  Mediating between the muse and the masses: inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Scott E. Cassidy,et al.  Inspiration and the promotion of well-being: tests of causality and mediation. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[16]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Assessing Creativity Using the Consensual Assessment Technique , 2009 .

[17]  Technique John Baer Chapter IV Assessing Creativity Using the Consensual Assessment , 2009 .

[18]  A. Elliot Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation , 2008 .

[19]  B. Hoebel,et al.  An Accumbens Dopamine–Acetylcholine System for Approach and Avoidance , 2008 .

[20]  J. Panksepp,et al.  Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: An affective neuroethological perspective , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[21]  S. Atkinson Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation , 2007 .

[22]  Edward M Bowden,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[23]  C. Frye Progestins influence motivation, reward, conditioning, stress, and/or response to drugs of abuse , 2007, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[24]  T. Thrash Differentiation of the distributions of inspiration and positive affect across days of the week: An application of logistic multilevel modeling. , 2007 .

[25]  Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic,et al.  Creativity versus conscientiousness : Which is a better predictor of student performance? , 2006 .

[26]  Zoltán Rihmer,et al.  Creativity and mental illness , 1995, American Journal of Psychiatry.

[27]  Helen E. Fisher,et al.  Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  New approaches to demystifying insight , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  A. Elliot,et al.  Inspiration: core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research , 2004 .

[31]  R. Wise Dopamine, learning and motivation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Corinne Faure,et al.  Beyond Brainstorming: Effects of Different Group Procedures on Selection of Ideas and Satisfaction with the Process , 2004 .

[33]  John Baer,et al.  Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to Nonparallel Creative Products , 2004 .

[34]  Stuart G. Shanker,et al.  The nature of insight , 1995, Minds and Machines.

[35]  Nicholas Ind,et al.  Inspiration and Creativity , 2004 .

[36]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  C. Frye,et al.  Olanzapine’s effects to reduce fear and anxiety and enhance social interactions coincide with increased progestin concentrations of ovariectomized rats , 2003, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[39]  A. Elliot,et al.  Inspiration as a psychological construct. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Kamran Baig An act of creation , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary , 2002 .

[42]  M. A. De Luca,et al.  Differential Expression of Motivational Stimulus Properties by Dopamine in Nucleus Accumbens Shell versus Core and Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Grace,et al.  Dopamine-mediated modulation of odour-evoked amygdala potentials during pavlovian conditioning , 2002, Nature.

[44]  Sharon Bailin CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[45]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. , 2001, Emotion.

[46]  C. Frye,et al.  Posttraining androgens’ enhancement of cognitive performance is temporally distinct from androgens’ increases in affective behavior , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[47]  C. Martindale,et al.  Oscillations and analogies. Thomas Young, MD, FRS, genius. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[48]  D. Simonton Creativity. Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[49]  D. Levine,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. , 1999, Psychological review.

[50]  R. Depue,et al.  Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[51]  J. Vaidya,et al.  The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence , 1999 .

[52]  W. Goebel,et al.  Differential expression of , 1999 .

[53]  Gregory J. Feist A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[54]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[55]  S. Fienberg,et al.  The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. , 1991 .

[56]  K. Jamison Mood Disorders and Patterns of Creativity in British Writers and Artists , 1989 .

[57]  C. Martindale Personality, situation, and creativity. , 1989 .

[58]  K. Jamison Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. , 1989, Psychiatry.

[59]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  T. Amabile,et al.  The conditions of creativity. , 1988 .

[61]  S. Ohlsson Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. , 1984 .

[62]  R. Mayer Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition , 1983 .

[63]  T. M. Amabile Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[64]  Carl Fehrman,et al.  Poetic creation: Inspiration or craft , 1980 .

[65]  Albert Rothenberg,et al.  The Emerging Goddess: The Creative Process in Art, Science and Other Fields , 1979 .

[66]  C. Martindale,et al.  EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process, and effort to be original , 1978, Biological Psychology.

[67]  Ronald E. Lesher Assessment of Creativity. , 1973 .

[68]  Rosamond E. M. Harding,et al.  Anatomy of Inspiration , 1967 .

[69]  Howard E. Gruber,et al.  Contemporary approaches to creative thinking : a symposium held at the University of Colorado , 1962 .

[70]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[71]  C. Bowra,et al.  Inspiration and Poetry , 1956 .

[72]  E. Kris,et al.  Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art , 1952 .

[73]  Rosamond E. M. Harding,et al.  An anatomy of inspiration and an essay on the creative mood , 1948 .