Production Model Discourse and Experiences from the Swedish Automotive Industry

Discusses production models for final assembly in the automotive industry and also reports on the performance of one final assembly plant representing an innovative production model, namely the Volvo Uddevalla plant. Briefly considers some issues and pitfalls in current production model discourse, and in this connection introduces a distinction between two manufacturing models and broader industrial models. Describes two manufacturing models for final assembly work as namely the “serial flow model” and the “parallel flow model”. Discusses the Japanese “lean production”, sometimes synonymous with “Toyotism”, as an industrial model and the impact of socio‐economic and socio‐cultural contexts on manufacturing models and industrial models. Concludes that the Uddevalla plant highlights the paradox that long cycle time work in parallel flow assembly systems is in fact more efficient than short cycle time work in serial flow systems, provided that suitable technical and administrative preconditions exist. Therefore, the engineering point of view and the Swedish experiences of innovative manufacturing systems should be carefully considered in the current production model discourse.

[1]  Lennart Nilsson,et al.  Reflektiv produktion – Industriell verksamhet i förnyelse , 1992 .

[2]  G. Becattini,et al.  Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy , 1990 .

[3]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Evaluation Methods for Assembly Work and Product Design in Radically Different Production Systems: Results from case studies and action research in Swedish industry , 1993 .

[4]  R. Florida,et al.  Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System and Its Transfer to the U.S. , 1993 .

[5]  Åke Sandberg.  Enriching Production: Perspectives on Volvo's Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production , 1995 .

[6]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Data collection and analysis of manual work using video recording and personal computer techniques , 1997 .

[7]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Beyond Mass Production. , 1994 .

[8]  Henrik Brynzér.  Evaluation of kitting systems : implications for kitting system design , 1995 .

[9]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[10]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Datainsamling och analys av serieproduktionssystem genom att kombinera video- och persondatorteknik , 1994 .

[11]  Jos Benders,et al.  Leaving Lean? Recent Changes in the Production Organization of some Japanese Car Plants , 1996 .

[12]  Hans-Jörg Bullinger,et al.  Innovative production structures -- Precondition for a customer-orientated production management , 1995 .

[13]  Robert R. Rehder.  Saturn, Uddevalla and the Japanese lean systems: paradoxical prototypes for the twenty-first century , 1994 .

[14]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies , 1992 .

[15]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[16]  Andy Adcroft,et al.  Cars: Analysis, History, Cases , 1994 .

[17]  Eileen Appelbaum,et al.  The New American Workplace , 1993 .

[18]  A. Adcroft,et al.  Against lean production , 1992 .

[19]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[20]  Kay Wild.  On the selection of mass production systems , 1975 .