PebbleBox and CrumbleBag: Tactile Interfaces for Granular Synthesis

The PebbleBox and the CrumbleBag are examples of a granular interaction paradigm, in which the manipulation of physical grains of arbitrary material becomes the basis for interacting with granular sound synthesis models. The sounds made by the grains as they are manipulated are analysed, and parameters such as grain rate, grain amplitude and grain density are extracted. These parameters are then used to control the granulation of arbitrary sound samples in real time. In this way, a direct link is made between the haptic sensation of interacting with grains and the control of granular sounds.

[1]  L. Carroll,et al.  The lobster quadrille , 1977 .

[2]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[4]  Cort Lippe,et al.  A Musical Application of Real-time Granular Sampling Using the IRCAM Signal Processing Workstation , 1993, ICMC.

[5]  Marcelo M. Wanderley,et al.  Instrumental Gestural Mapping Strategies as Expressivity Determinants in Computer Music Performance , 1997 .

[6]  J. A. Paradiso Electronic money: toward a virtual wallet , 1997 .

[7]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  Physically Informed Sonic Modeling (PhISM): Synthesis of percussive sounds , 1997 .

[8]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  Toward physically-informed parametric synthesis of sound effects , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. WASPAA'99 (Cat. No.99TH8452).

[9]  Gil Weinberg Expressive Digital Musical Instruments for Children , 1999 .

[10]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  BoSSA: The Deconstructed Violin Reconstructed , 2000, ICMC.

[11]  Marcelo M. Wanderley,et al.  Towards a Model for Instrumental Mapping in Expert Musical Interaction , 2000, ICMC.

[12]  Chris Chafe,et al.  Playing by feel: incorporating haptic feedback into computer-based musical instruments , 2001 .

[13]  Tristan Jehan,et al.  An Audio-Driven, Spectral Analysis-Based, Perceptual Synthesis Engine , 2001 .

[14]  Jonathan Berger,et al.  Everyday sounds: synthesis parameters and perceptual correlates , 2001 .

[15]  Xavier Rodet,et al.  Automatically selecting signal descriptors for SoundClassification , 2002, ICMC.

[16]  Timothy Opie Granular Synthesis: Experiments In Live Performance , 2002 .

[17]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  The Sounding Object , 2002 .

[18]  Tod Machover,et al.  Sparkler: An Audio-Driven Interactive Live Computer Performance for Symphony Orchestra , 2002, ICMC.

[19]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  MetaMuse: a novel control metaphor for granular synthesis , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  Real Sound Synthesis for Interactive Applications , 2002 .

[21]  Marcelo M. Wanderley,et al.  The Importance of Parameter Mapping in Electronic Instrument Design , 2002, NIME.

[22]  A. Eremenko,et al.  Oscillation of Fourier Integrals with a spectral gap , 2003, math/0301060.

[23]  Timothy Tristram Opie,et al.  Creation of a Real-Time Granular Synthesis Instrument for Live Performance , 2003 .

[24]  Michael J. Lyons,et al.  Proceedings of the 2004 conference on New interfaces for musical expression , 2004 .

[25]  Gil Weinberg,et al.  The Musical Playpen: An immersive digital musical instrument , 1999, Personal Technologies.

[26]  Georg Essl,et al.  Towards evaluation of performance: Control of preference in physical and virtual sensorimotor integration , 2005 .

[27]  Georgios Tziritas,et al.  A speech/music discriminator based on RMS and zero-crossings , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[28]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.