Optimal annual routines: new tools for conservation biology?

Many applied problems in ecology and conservation require prediction, and population models are important tools for that purpose. Formerly, the majority of predictive population models were based on matrix models. As the limitations of classical matrix models have become clearer, the use of individual-based models has increased. These models use behavioral rules imposed at the level of the individual to establish the emergent consequences of those rules at the population level. Individual behaviors in such models use an array of different rule types, from empirically derived probabilities to long-term fitness considerations. There has been surprisingly little discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of these different rule types. Here, we consider different strategies for modeling individual behaviors, together with some problems associated with individual-based models. We propose a novel approach based on modeling optimal annual routines. Annual routines allow individual behaviors to be predicted over a whole annual cycle within the context of long-term fitness considerations. Temporal trade-offs between different behaviors are automatically included in annual routine models, overcoming some of the primary limitations of other individual-based models. Furthermore, as well as population predictions, individual behaviors and indices of condition are emergent features of annual routine models. We show that these can be more sensitive to environmental change than population size, offering alternative, repeatable metrics for monitoring population status. Annual routine models provide no panacea for the problems of data limitations in predictive population modeling. However, as a result of their ability to deal with life-history trade-offs, as well as their potential for relatively rapid and accurate validation and parameterization, we suggest that annual routine models have strong potential for predictive population modeling in applied conservation settings.

[1]  R. Peters,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987, Restoration & Management Notes.

[2]  A. Houston,et al.  State-dependent life histories , 1996, Nature.

[3]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Wendy C. H. Green,et al.  Persistent influences of birth date on dominance, growth and reproductive success in bison , 1993 .

[5]  Paul F. Doherty,et al.  Balancing conservation and economic gain: a dynamic programming approach , 1999 .

[6]  Ian Newton,et al.  Can conditions experienced during migration limit the population levels of birds? , 2006, Journal of Ornithology.

[7]  A. Kacelnik CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING IN STARLINGS (STURNUS-VULGARIS) .1. PATCH RESIDENCE TIME , 1984 .

[8]  J. Krebs,et al.  Agriculture: Widespread local house-sparrow extinctions , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Precision of Population Viability Analysis , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  E. Ketterson,et al.  Winter fattening in the dark-eyed junco: plasticity and possible interaction with migration trade-offs , 1994, Oecologia.

[11]  Hobson,et al.  Linking winter and summer events in a migratory bird by using stable-carbon isotopes , 1998, Science.

[12]  J. Garvey,et al.  Understanding latitudinal trends in fish body size through models of optimal seasonal energy allocation , 2003 .

[13]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting the strength of interference more quickly using behaviour‐based models , 2002 .

[14]  A. Houston,et al.  Annual routines of non‐migratory birds: optimal moult strategies , 2006 .

[15]  V. Grimm Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[16]  William J Sutherland,et al.  Population regulation in group-living birds: predictive models of the Seychelles warbler. , 2003, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  D. Bunnell,et al.  Optimal energy allocation to ovaries after spawning , 2003 .

[18]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The timing of migration within the context of an annual routine , 1998 .

[19]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting the functional response of a farmland bird , 2006 .

[21]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota , 2003 .

[22]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes , 2005 .

[23]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Critiques of PVA Ask the Wrong Questions: Throwing the Heuristic Baby Out with the Numerical Bath Water , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  C. Voigt,et al.  A non-invasive technique to bleed incubating birds without trapping: a blood-sucking bug in a hollow egg , 2005, Journal of Ornithology.

[25]  A. Łomnicki Individual-based models and the individual-based approach to population ecology , 1999 .

[26]  P. Pap,et al.  Breeding time and sex-specific health status in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) , 2002 .

[27]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[28]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The importance of behavioural studies in conservation biology , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology , 1992 .

[30]  T Coulson,et al.  The use and abuse of population viability analysis. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  The effects of background mortality on optimal reproduction in a seasonal environment. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[32]  W. Sutherland From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[33]  P. Bednekoff Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach based on State , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[35]  A. Houston,et al.  Starvation and Predation as Factors Limiting Population Size , 1987 .

[36]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[37]  G. Mayr New specimens of the early Eocene stem group galliform Paraortygoides (Gallinuloididae), with comments on the evolution of a crop in the stem lineage of Galliformes , 2006, Journal of Ornithology.

[38]  G. Pierce,et al.  Eight Reasons Why Optimal Foraging Theory Is a Complete Waste of Time , 1987 .

[39]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Periodic food availability and strategic regulation of body mass in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris , 1995 .

[40]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology , 1988, Nature.

[41]  Paulette Bierzychudek,et al.  LOOKING BACKWARDS: ASSESSING THE PROJECTIONS OF A TRANSITION MATRIX MODEL , 1999 .

[43]  P. Fauchald,et al.  Adaptive regulation of body reserves in reindeer, Rangifer tarandus: a feeding experiment , 2004 .

[44]  Richard D. Gregory,et al.  Long‐term changes in over‐winter survival rates explain the decline of reed buntings Emberiza schoeniclus in Britain , 1999 .

[45]  S. Stearns,et al.  Evolutionary Insights Should Not Be Wasted , 1987 .

[46]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[47]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Depletion models can predict shorebird distribution at different spatial scales , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[49]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Minimum viable populations : Processes of species extinction , 1986 .

[50]  G. Huse Individual‐based Modeling and Ecology , 2008 .

[51]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[52]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Dispersal, Eviction, and Conflict in Meerkats (Suricata suricatta): An Evolutionarily Stable Strategy Model , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[53]  D. Schluter,et al.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study , 2002 .

[55]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  An individual behaviour‐based model can predict shorebird mortality using routinely collected shellfishery data , 2003 .

[57]  H. Moller,et al.  Can PVA models using computer packages offer useful conservation advice? Sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus in New Zealand as a case study , 1995 .

[58]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal annual routines: behaviour in the context of physiology and ecology , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Predicting population responses to resource management , 2001 .

[60]  R. Ydenberg,et al.  Death and danger at migratory stopovers: problems with “predation risk” , 2003 .

[61]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  The Evolutionary Demography of Ecological Change: Linking Trait Variation and Population Growth , 2007, Science.

[62]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting shorebird mortality and population size under different regimes of shellfishery management , 2001 .

[63]  A Houston,et al.  The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[65]  A. Carlson Maximizing energy delivery to dependent young: a field experiment with red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio). , 1983 .

[66]  G. Hill Ornamental Traits as Indicators of Environmental HealthCondition-dependent display traits hold promise as potent biomonitors , 1995 .

[67]  D. Norris Carry-over effects and habitat quality in migratory populations , 2005 .

[68]  J. Gils,et al.  Holling's functional response model as a tool to link the food-finding mechanism of a probing shorebird with its spatial distribution , 1995 .

[69]  E. J. Collins,et al.  A general technique for computing evolutionarily stable strategies based on errors in decision-making. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[70]  A. Walter The evolution of marmot sociality: I. Why disperse late? , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[71]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[72]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The potential for application of individual-based simulation models for assessing the effects of global change , 1992 .

[73]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Amelioration of biodiversity impacts of genetically modified crops: predicting transient versus long–term effects , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  P. Marra,et al.  The Importance of Understanding Migratory Connectivity and Seasonal Interactions , 2005 .

[75]  S. Côté,et al.  Birthdate, mass and survival in mountain goat kids: effects of maternal characteristics and forage quality , 2001, Oecologia.

[76]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Conserving Bird Biodiversity: Predicting the impact of environmental change , 2002 .

[77]  I. Newton Population limitation in migrants , 2004 .

[78]  J. N. Thompson,et al.  Rapid evolution as an ecological process. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[79]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods* , 2006 .

[80]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Can Individual-Based Models Yield a Better Assessment of Population Variability? , 2000 .

[81]  Nancy Jennings,et al.  REVIEW: Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice , 2005 .

[82]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the response of farmland bird populations to changing food supplies , 2003 .

[83]  A. Houston,et al.  Patch choice and population size , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[84]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  EFFICACY OF POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[85]  A R. Watkinson,et al.  Policy making within ecological uncertainty: lessons from badgers and GM crops. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[86]  Andrew D. West,et al.  Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour‐based model , 2000 .

[87]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Sustainable exploitation of social species: a test and comparison of models , 2002 .

[88]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[89]  S. Wanless,et al.  Using behavioural and state variables to identify proximate causes of population change in a seabird , 2006, Oecologia.

[90]  A. Houston,et al.  A Theoretical Investigation of the Effect of Latitude on Avian Life Histories , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[91]  I. Cuthill,et al.  The ecological costs of avian fat storage. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[92]  Russell Greenberg,et al.  Birds of two worlds : the ecology and evolution of migration , 2005 .

[93]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal moult strategies in migratory birds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[94]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time , 2005 .

[95]  A. Walter The evolution of marmot sociality: II. Costs and benefits of joint hibernation , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[96]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Spatially explicit, individual-based, behavioural models of the annual cycle of two migratory goose populations , 2000 .

[97]  I. Hanski,et al.  Natural selection and population dynamics. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[98]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Brood desertion in Kentish plover the value of parental care , 1999 .

[99]  M. Foster The Overlap of Molting and Breeding in Some Tropical Birds , 1975 .

[100]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Predation risk and the cost of being fat , 1995, Nature.

[101]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology: Methods and Applications , 2001 .

[102]  D. Lack,et al.  Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds , 1969 .

[103]  John M. Drake,et al.  Population Viability Analysis , 2019, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[104]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A spatial depletion model of the interaction between bean geese and wigeon with the consequences for habitat management , 1994 .

[105]  M. Shaffer Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .