Getting Ready for Carbon Capture and Storage by Issuing Capture Options

A capture option is an option contract where the option holder can exercise a contract to retrofit an existing fossil fuel plant to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) on or before a fixed date. We suggest that new thermal power plants, particularly those in developing countries, consider issuing capture options at the design stage, because the sellers—the owners of newly built thermal power plants—may then invest in making these plants CO2 capture ready (CCR) to optimise returns from selling capture options. In a detailed case study on a 600 MW ultrasupercritical pulverised coal-fired power unit a potential storage site in Guangdong, China, the value of a capture option and CCR investment is evaluated using the backward deduction option pricing method through a stochastic cash flow model with Monte-Carlo simulations. If the power plant is retrofittable without CCR investment, then for an 8% discount rate the value of a capture option is US $11 million before CCR investment. Investing US $3.8 million in CCR increases the value of the capture option by an estimated US $12 million. Perhaps more important from a policy point of view, CCR investment can reduce the odds of early closure by 20% and also increase the chance of retrofitting to capture by 43%. If the power plant is not retrofittable in the absence of CCR design modifications, CCR investment to avoid ‘carbon lock-in’ is not only important for climate policy but is also economic from an investment point of view. We also conduct sensitivity analyses on a range of key assumptions to test the robustness of the findings.

[1]  Helen Wallace,et al.  The Council and the European Parliament , 1997 .

[2]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2005 .

[3]  Ram Chandra Sekar,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture from Coal-Fired Power Plants : A Real Options Analysis , 2005 .

[4]  Thane Brown,et al.  Engineering Economics and Economic Design for Process Engineers , 2006 .

[5]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2007 , 2007 .

[6]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance , 2007 .

[7]  David Reiner,et al.  Stakeholder Attitudes towards Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies in China , 2007 .

[8]  D. Newbery,et al.  Fuel mix diversification incentives in liberalized electricity markets: A Mean–Variance Portfolio theory approach , 2008 .

[9]  Issuing Capture Options with the virtue of Financing CCR and Assisting Policy Making , 2008 .

[10]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Assessing the effects of CO2 price caps on electricity investments—A real options analysis , 2008 .

[11]  S. Haszeldine,et al.  How ready is ‘ capture ready ’ ?-Preparing the UK power sector for carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[12]  Luis M. Abadie,et al.  European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments , 2008 .

[13]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Retrofitting CO2 capture ready fossil plants with post-combustion capture. Part 1: Requirements for supercritical pulverized coal plants using solvent-based flue gas scrubbing , 2009 .

[14]  D. Reiner,et al.  Assessing the value of CO2 capture ready in new-build pulverised coal-fired power plants in China , 2009 .

[15]  David Reiner,et al.  Stakeholders' Perceptions of Demonstrating CCS in China ‐ A Study for EU‐UK‐China Near Zero Emissions Coal Initiative (NZEC) , 2009 .

[16]  Kelly Sims Gallagher,et al.  Driving Carbon Capture and Storage forward in China , 2009 .

[17]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Policymaking benefits and limitations from using financial methods and modelling in electricity markets , 2010 .

[18]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Carbon Capture , 2012 .