Innovative activity in Canadian food processing establishments: the importance of engineering practices

This paper examines the factors contributing to innovative activity in the Canadian food-processing sector. Several factors relating to innovation are considered. Firstly, it focuses not only on the importance of research and development activity but also on advanced business practices used by production and engineering departments. Secondly, it examines the extent to which a larger firm size and less competition serve to stimulate competition - the so-called Schumpeterian hypothesis. Thirdly, the effect of the nationality of a firm on innovation is also investigated. Fourthly, industry effects are examined. The paper finds that business practices are significantly related to the probability that a firm is innovative. This is also the case for R&D. Size effects are significant, particularly for process innovations. Elsewhere, their effect is greatly diminished once business practices are included. Foreign ownership is significant only for process-only innovations. Competition matters, more so for product than for process innovations. Establishments in the "other" food products industry tend to lead the industry average when it comes to innovation, whereas fish product plants tend to lag behind the industry average.

[1]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[2]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[3]  Erik Brouwer,et al.  Determinants of Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators , 1996 .

[4]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[5]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Schumpeterian Conjectures: A Moderate Support from Various Innovation Measures , 1996 .

[6]  John T. Scott,et al.  Competition in an Open Economy: A Model Applied to Canada , 1980 .

[7]  Daniel B. Suits,et al.  Dummy Variables: Mechanics v. Interpretation , 1984 .

[8]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism , 1992 .

[9]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[10]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[11]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[12]  A. Sterlacchini Technological Opportunities, Intraindustry Spillovers And Firm R&D Intensity , 1994 .

[13]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Determinants of innovation : the message from new indicators , 1996 .

[14]  J. Baldwin Analytical Studies Branch The Importance of Research and Development for Innovation in Small and Large Canadian Manufacturing Firms , 1997 .

[15]  Zoltan J. Acs,et al.  Are small firms important? : their role and impact , 1999 .

[16]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights , 2000 .

[17]  G. Licht,et al.  Factors Determining R&D and Innovation Expenditure in German Manufacturing Industries , 1996 .

[18]  C. F. Phillips Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[19]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[20]  Spyros Arvanitis,et al.  Industrial Innovation in Switzerland: A Model-based Analysis with Survey Data , 1996 .