Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study

Aims To identify risk factors for rebubbling, and early graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods In this prospective registry study, all consecutive DMEK procedures registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were assessed (n=752). Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression. The effect of rebubbling on endothelial cell density was analysed using a linear mixed model. Results 144 of 752 (19%) eyes underwent rebubbling. Rebubbling was successful in 101 eyes (70%). In eyes that underwent rebubbling, the graft failure rate was significantly higher than eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (30% vs 9%, respectively; OR: 4.28, 95% CI 2.72 to 6.73, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for rebubbling were surgical complication (OR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.33, p=0.012) and older recipient age (OR: 1.04 (per increase of 1 year), 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.003). Risk factors for developing graft failure within 3 months were transplant before 2016 (OR: 3.32, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.90, p<0.001), and surgical complication (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.04, p=0.004). Throughout the study period, rebubbling and early graft failure were inversely related. Eyes that underwent rebubbling showed significantly lower endothelial cell densities at 3, 6 and 12 months compared with eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (all p<0.001). Conclusions This Dutch registry study identified independent risk factors for DMEK graft detachment leading to rebubbling, namely recipient age and surgical complication, and early graft failure, namely transplantation before 2016 and surgical complication. Rebubbling was associated with significantly higher endothelial cell loss in the first year after surgery.

[1]  Naoko Kato,et al.  Effect of Graft Shift Direction on Graft Detachment and Endothelial Cell Survival After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2019, Cornea.

[2]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Influence of Postoperative Intraocular Pressure on Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2018, Cornea.

[3]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Recovery of Corneal Clarity After DMEK Followed by Rebubbling Versus Uneventful DMEK , 2018, Cornea.

[4]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Evolution of Consecutive Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes Throughout a 5-Year Period Performed by Two Experienced Surgeons. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  D. Sousa,et al.  Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% Versus Air 100% for Anterior Chamber Tamponade in DMEK: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Cornea.

[6]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[7]  B. Seitz,et al.  Trends in Corneal Transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: A Report of the DOG-Section Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Ruzza,et al.  Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Anthony N Kuo,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[10]  John P Berdahl,et al.  Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2017, Clinical ophthalmology.

[11]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Multicenter Study of 6-Month Clinical Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[12]  Daniel Pilger,et al.  Rebubbling in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Influence of Pressure and Duration of the Intracameral Air Tamponade. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Verdijk,et al.  Histopathologic Features of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Remnants, Folds, and Detachments. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Joussen,et al.  Rate and Localization of Graft Detachment in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[15]  E. G. Groeneveld-van Beek,et al.  Association Between Graft Storage Time and Donor Age With Endothelial Cell Density and Graft Adherence After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, JAMA ophthalmology.

[16]  T. Röck,et al.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[17]  P. Steven,et al.  Spontaneous long-term course of persistent peripheral graft detachments after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  U. Pleyer,et al.  Clinicopathology of graft detachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[19]  F. Price,et al.  Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five‐year follow‐up , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  S. Chaurasia,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[21]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Graft adhesion in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's descemet membrane. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[22]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  M. B. Goren The Eye Bank Association of America. , 2006, Comprehensive ophthalmology update.

[24]  P. Saffigna,et al.  The recovery of , 1994 .