Conditions for effective smart learning environments

Smart learning environments (SLEs) are defined in this paper as physical environments that are enriched with digital, context-aware and adaptive devices, to promote better and faster learning. In order to identify the requirements for ‘better and faster learning’, the idea of Human Learning Interfaces (HLI) is presented, i.e. the set of learning related interaction mechanisms that humans expose to the outside world that can be used to control, stimulate and facilitate their learning processes. It is assumed that humans have and use these HLIs for all types of learning, and that others, such as parents, teachers, friends, and digital devices can interact with the interface to help a person to learn something. Three basic HLIs are identified that represent three distinct types of learning: learning to deal with new situations (identification), learning to behave in a social group (socialization) and learning by creating something (creation). These three HLIs involve a change in cognitive representations and behavior. Performance can be increased using the practice HLI, and meta-cognitive development is supported by the reflection HLI. This analysis of HLIs is used to identify the conditions for the development of effective smart learning environments and a research agenda for SLEs.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[2]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[3]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The control of short-term memory. , 1971, Scientific American.

[4]  J. Hafler,et al.  The Hidden Curriculum, Structural Disconnects, and the Socialization of New Professionals , 2011 .

[5]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A model of heuristic judgment , 2005 .

[6]  Tom Gross,et al.  Awareness in Context-Aware Information Systems , 2001, MuC.

[7]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[9]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[10]  W. Damon,et al.  Social, emotional, and personality development , 1998 .

[11]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[12]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[13]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[14]  D. Carlston The Oxford handbook of social cognition , 2013 .

[15]  Berit Karseth,et al.  The various understandings of learning environment in higher education and its quality implications , 2013 .

[16]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Chapter 5 Human Mimicry , 2009 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[18]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[20]  A. Bandura,et al.  Developmental psychology : Bandura , Ross and Ross ( 1961 ) Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models , 2015 .

[21]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping , 2011, Science.

[22]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Thinking through Technology , 1994 .

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[24]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Faces are Central to Social Cognition , 2013 .

[25]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[26]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Deep Learning - How the Mind Overrides Experience , 2011 .

[28]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[29]  A. Bandura,et al.  Imitation of film-mediated agressive models. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[30]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[31]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin , 2004 .

[32]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[33]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[34]  J. Sweller The worked example effect and human cognition , 2006 .

[35]  R. Sun,et al.  The two systems of learning: an architectural perspective , 2009 .

[36]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Learning Styles , 2008, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[37]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[38]  Em Griffin A First Look at Communication Theory , 2005 .

[39]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Role of Symbolic Coding and Rehearsal Processes in Observational Learning. , 1973 .

[40]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[41]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[42]  Jonathan Evans How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? , 2009 .

[43]  R. Evans,et al.  Reliability of the "Draw-a-Man" test. , 1975 .

[44]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[45]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[46]  D. Bugental,et al.  Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: a domain-based approach. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[48]  H. Pashler,et al.  The influence of retrieval on retention , 1992, Memory & cognition.