Knowledge characteristics of communities of practice

This paper proposes a typology of communities of practice based on their knowledge characteristics. The structure of a community of practice, in terms of knowledge, may tend to the stratified or to the egalitarian. The predominant knowledge activity of the community may be sharing or nurturing. This produces four classes of community of practice. The paper identifies and discusses examples of these classes. It is argued that the class to which a community belongs tends to determine the rapidity with which knowledge within the community evolves and the degree of pluralism, as opposed to homogeneity, that the knowledge exhibits. The paper concludes by discussing some of the implications of the typology for knowledge management practice.

[1]  P. V. H. Weems,et al.  Learning to Navigate , 1943 .

[2]  Christopher Grey,et al.  On being a professional in a "Big Six" firm , 1998 .

[3]  Alan McKinlay,et al.  The Limits of Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[4]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[5]  Karin Garrety,et al.  Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects , 2004 .

[6]  Val Singh,et al.  Informal Mentoring as an Organisational Resource , 2002 .

[7]  J. Ward,et al.  Strategic Planning for Information Systems , 1990 .

[8]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach , 2006, J. Documentation.

[9]  Paul Keys,et al.  Understanding the process of operational research : collected readings , 1994 .

[10]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Con Connell,et al.  Sharing notes: amateur musical events from a knowledge management perspective , 2003 .

[12]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community , 1998 .

[13]  Musical Performance: Communicating with the body in performance , 2002 .

[14]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[15]  John Gabbay,et al.  A Case Study of Knowledge Management in Multiagency Consumer-Informed `Communities of Practice': Implications for Evidence-Based Policy Development in Health and Social Services , 2003 .

[16]  Glenn Robert,et al.  Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales , 2002 .

[17]  Martin Harris,et al.  Strategic planning for information systems , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[19]  J. Swan,et al.  The Construction of `Communities of Practice' in the Management of Innovation , 2002 .

[20]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[21]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[22]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[23]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[24]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting: a case study , 2003 .

[25]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Learning Groups: What Types are there? A Theoretical Analysis and an Empirical Study in a Consultancy Firm , 2004 .

[26]  E. Hutchins.  Understanding practice: Learning to navigate , 1993 .

[27]  A. Whitaker.  The Fabric of Reality , 2001 .

[28]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .