Simple Evidence Elimination in Justification Logic

Suppose that the prosecutor presents the jury with exhibit x 1, an audio recording of a boss ordering his subordinate to falsify the accounting ledgers so as to deceive the investors into thinking that his insolvent company is not actually insolvent. Suppose further that the judge provides the jury with oral instructions x 2 stating that the jury may use the following principle in reaching its verdict: “if the boss ordered his subordinate to falsify the ledgers, then the boss is guilty of fraud.” Using the principle described by the judge’s instructions x 2, the recording x 1 provides the jury with sufficient evidence to find the boss guilty of fraud.