Tungsten carbide-cobalt as a nanoparticulate reference positive control in in vitro genotoxicity assays.

With the increasing human exposure to nanoparticles (NP), the evaluation of their genotoxic potential is of significant importance. However, relevance for NP of the routinely used in vitro genotoxicity assays is often questioned, and a nanoparticulate reference positive control would therefore constitute an important step to a better testing of NP, ensuring that test systems are really appropriate. In this study, we investigated the possibility of using tungsten carbide-cobalt (WC-Co) NP as reference positive control in in vitro genotoxicity assays, including 2 regulatory assays, the mouse lymphoma assay and the micronucleus assay, and in the Comet assay, recommended for the toxicological evaluation of nanomedicines by the French Agency of Human Health Products (Afssaps). Through these assays, we were able to study different genetic endpoints in 2 cell types commonly used in regulatory genotoxicity assays: the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line and primary cultures of human lymphocytes. Our results showed that the use of WC-Co NP as positive control in in vitro genotoxicity assays was conceivable, but that different parameters have to be considered, such as cell type and treatment schedule. L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells did not provide satisfactory results in the 3 performed tests. However, human lymphocytes were more sensitive to genotoxic effects induced by WC-Co NP, particularly after a 24-h treatment in the in vitro micronucleus assay and after a 4-h treatment in the in vitro Comet assay. Under such conditions, WC-Co could be used as a nanoparticulate reference positive control in these assays.

[1]  Wibke Busch,et al.  Agglomeration of tungsten carbide nanoparticles in exposure medium does not prevent uptake and toxicity toward a rainbow trout gill cell line. , 2009, Aquatic toxicology.

[2]  Wibke Busch,et al.  Toxicity of Tungsten Carbide and Cobalt-Doped Tungsten Carbide Nanoparticles in Mammalian Cells in Vitro , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Dominique Lison,et al.  In vitro genotoxic effects of different combinations of cobalt and metallic carbide particles. , 2003, Mutagenesis.

[4]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Mechanisms of genotoxicity. A review of in vitro and in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles , 2014, Nanotoxicology.

[5]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  In vitro genotoxic effects of hard metal particles assessed by alkaline single cell gel and elution assays. , 1997, Carcinogenesis.

[6]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Can Standard Genotoxicity Tests be Applied to Nanoparticles? , 2012, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[7]  P. Wild,et al.  Lung cancer mortality in a site producing hard metals , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[8]  K. Schirmer,et al.  Comparative evaluation of particle properties, formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic potential of tungsten carbide based nanoparticles in vitro. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  S. Doak,et al.  NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[10]  G. Jenkins,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines , 2012, Mutation research.

[11]  L. Migliore,et al.  Multiple cytotoxic and genotoxic effects induced in vitro by differently shaped copper oxide nanomaterials. , 2013, Mutagenesis.

[12]  Isao Yoshimura,et al.  Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: Follow‐up meeting of the international workshop on Genotoxicity testing—Aberdeen, Scotland, 2003—Assay acceptance criteria, positive controls, and data evaluation , 2006, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[13]  A Elhajouji,et al.  Spindle poisons can induce polyploidy by mitotic slippage and micronucleate mononucleates in the cytokinesis-block assay. , 1998, Mutagenesis.

[14]  P. Wild,et al.  Lung cancer risk in hard-metal workers. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  B. Jiang,et al.  Size-dependent effects of tungsten carbide-cobalt particles on oxygen radical production and activation of cell signaling pathways in murine epidermal cells. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[16]  David B Warheit,et al.  Rationale of genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials: Regulatory requirements and appropriateness of available OECD test guidelines , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[17]  Ronald D Snyder,et al.  SFTG international collaborative study on in vitro micronucleus test III. Using CHO cells. , 2006, Mutation research.

[18]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[19]  François Huaux,et al.  Clastogenic and aneugenic effects of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in epithelial cells. , 2008, Carcinogenesis.

[20]  Ken Donaldson,et al.  Possible genotoxic mechanisms of nanoparticles: Criteria for improved test strategies , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[21]  P. M. Williams,et al.  Confounding experimental considerations in nanogenotoxicology. , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[22]  M. Fenech,et al.  HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. , 2003, Mutation research.

[23]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test and the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay for the detection of DNA damaging agents: genotoxic effects of cobalt powder, tungsten carbide and cobalt-tungsten carbide. , 1997, Mutation research.

[24]  Markus Schulz,et al.  Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations--many questions, some answers. , 2009, Mutation research.

[25]  Alexandra Kroll,et al.  Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[26]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  Evaluation of the in vitro direct and indirect genotoxic effects of cobalt compounds using the alkaline comet assay. Influence of interdonor and interexperimental variability. , 1998, Carcinogenesis.

[27]  A. Elhajouji,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity test approaches with better predictivity: summary of an IWGT workshop. , 2011, Mutation research.

[28]  Laetitia Gonzalez,et al.  Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: A critical review , 2008 .

[29]  Véronique Thybaud,et al.  SFTG international collaborative study on in vitro micronucleus test II. Using human lymphocytes. , 2006, Mutation research.

[30]  Benoit Nemery,et al.  In vivo genotoxicity of hard metal dust: induction of micronuclei in rat type II epithelial lung cells. , 2003, Carcinogenesis.

[31]  D. E. Carter,et al.  Cobalt in hard metals and cobalt sulfate, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide and vanadium pentoxide. , 2006, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[32]  D. Lison,et al.  Physicochemical mechanism of the interaction between cobalt metal and carbide particles to generate toxic activated oxygen species. , 1995, Chemical research in toxicology.

[33]  R. Tice,et al.  Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.