The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey

SummaryAuditory tuning curves of a small songbird, the great tit (Parus major), and of its principal avian predator, the European sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), were determined by an operant positive reinforcement conditioning procedure, using the method of constant stimuli. Thresholds were measured by the criterion of a 50% correct response and a d′ of 1.5 for intra- and interspecific comparison, respectively. The best frequency of both species was 2 kHz, the hawk being 6.5 dB SPL more sensitive than the tit. Although the high-frequency cutoff was very similar in both species, at 8 kHz the great tit was about 30 dB more sensitive than the sparrowhawk. The hearing abilities of the prey and its predator are discussed with reference to the acoustic alarm communication of great tits confronted with sparrowhawks. Two alarm calls lie in the frequency range of the best hearing of both the hawk and the tits: the mobbing call and a call given in response to a nearby hawk when fleeing from it. In contrast, the “seeet” call, an alarm call given mainly in response to distant flying sparrowhawks, can only be heard well by the tit. The implications of these results for hypotheses concerning the evolution of alarm calls in small songbirds are discussed.

[1]  J. Swets Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings , 1964 .

[2]  E. Odum Annual Cycle of the Black-Capped Chickadee: 3 , 1942 .

[3]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[4]  R. Dooling Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds , 1978 .

[5]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  4 – Auditory Perception in Birds , 1982 .

[6]  日本音響学会,et al.  Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates , 1980, Proceedings in Life Sciences.

[7]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  R. Hinde,et al.  Behaviour of the great tit (Parus major) and some other related species , 1952 .

[9]  Kurt M. Bauer,et al.  Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas. Vol. 4 , 1972 .

[10]  T. Geer Effects of Nesting Sparrowhawks on Nesting Tits , 1978 .

[11]  P. Drent The functional ethology of territoriality in the great tit ( Parus major L.) , 1983 .

[12]  P. Marler,et al.  Characteristics of Some Animal Calls , 1955, Nature.

[13]  R. Dooling,et al.  Auditory sensitivity, equal loudness, temporal resolving power, and vocalizations in the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  Eliot A. Brenowitz The active space of red-winged blackbird song , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[15]  K. Regelmann,et al.  An anti-predator response in the great tit (Parus major): Is it tuned to predator risk? , 1983, Oecologia.

[16]  R. Fitter Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the World by Leslie Brown and Dean Amadon. Two vols. Country Life, 15 gns. , 1969, Oryx.

[17]  D. Amadon,et al.  Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the World , 1989 .

[18]  W. Latimer,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Songs and Alarm Calls of some Parus Species , 1977 .

[19]  M. Sachs,et al.  Auditory sensitivity of the redwing Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) and brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater).. , 1977 .