Effects of diversity of tree species and size on forest basal area growth, recruitment, and mortality

The objective of this study was to determine the relationship, or lack thereof, between growth and diversity of tree species and size in conifer stands of western North America. Growth was measured by net basal area growth and its components: survivor growth, recruitment, and mortality. The analysis used inventory data from permanent plots in the Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest type in Oregon and Washington, and in the mixed-conifer forest type in California. The methods consisted of generalized least square regression with spatial autocorrelation, controlling for the effect of other stand characteristics. Other things being equal, in the two forest types under study there was a strong positive relationship between net basal area growth and tree-species diversity. This effect was associated with higher recruitment in stands of higher tree-species diversity. Neither mortality nor growth of survivors was related to tree-species diversity. The relationship between growth and tree-size diversity was less clear. For Douglas-fir/western hemlock, net basal area growth was negatively correlated with tree-size diversity, essentially because recruitment waslower onplots of high tree-size diversity.Formixed conifers, netbasal area growthtended alsoto be lower inplots of high tree-size diversity, but this was mostly because mortality was higher in plots of higher tree-size diversity. # 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  D. Doak,et al.  Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: The role of positive interactions , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[3]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses , 2003, Oecologia.

[4]  L. S. Barden.  Drought and Survival in a Self-Perpetuating Pinus pungens Population: Equilibrium or Nonequilibrium? , 1988 .

[5]  Erich Barke,et al.  Hierarchical partitioning , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[6]  R. Monserud,et al.  Bootstrap Simulation and Response Surface Optimization of Management Regimes for Douglas-Fir/Western Hemlock Stands , 2006, Forest Science.

[7]  Mark W. Schwartz,et al.  Rare Species and Ecosystem Functioning , 2005 .

[8]  Robert Ornduff,et al.  Terrestrial Vegetation of California. , 1977 .

[9]  A. Goldberger.  A course in econometrics , 1991 .

[10]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[11]  Root Gorelick,et al.  Combining richness and abundance into a single diversity index using matrix analogues of Shannon's and Simpson's indices , 2006 .

[12]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. , 1980 .

[13]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Tree Size Diversity and Economic Returns in Uneven-Aged Forest Stands , 1994 .

[14]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[16]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  L. Boltzmann.  Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen , 1970 .

[18]  O. Loucks,et al.  Herbaceous Response to Canopy Cover, Light Intensity, and Throughfall Precipitation in Coniferous Forests , 1969 .

[19]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[20]  R. Lark,et al.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[21]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[22]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  User's guide to the stand prognosis model / , 1982 .

[23]  M. Kelty.  Productivity of New England hemlock/hardwood stands as affected by species composition and canopy structure , 1989 .

[24]  J. Fridley.  Diversity effects on production in different light and fertility environments: an experiment with communities of annual plants , 2003 .

[25]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[26]  S. Gower,et al.  Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  A. Ives,et al.  Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference , 2004 .

[28]  A. Nicotra,et al.  Aboveground interactions and productivity in mixed-species plantations of Acacia mearnsii and Eucalyptus globulus , 2004 .

[29]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Tree-size diversity between single- and mixed-species stands in three forest types in western Canada , 2005 .

[30]  R. Reese.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[31]  A. Magurran.  Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[32]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[33]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[34]  R. Mac Nally,et al.  Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000 .

[35]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Aboveground productivity of western hemlock and western redcedar mixed-species stands in southern coastal British Columbia , 2003 .

[36]  M. Vilà,et al.  Does tree diversity increase wood production in pine forests? , 2003, Oecologia.

[37]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. , 1980 .

[38]  A. Vyse,et al.  Regenerating British Columbia's forests. , 1990 .

[39]  E. C. Pielou.  Shannon's Formula as a Measure of Specific Diversity: Its Use and Misuse , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[40]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Robert A. Monserud,et al.  Large-scale management experiments in the moist maritime forests of the Pacific Northwest , 2002 .

[43]  H. Mooney,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function , 1994, Praktische Zahnmedizin Odonto-Stomatologie Pratique Practical Dental Medicine.

[44]  S. Stafford,et al.  Twenty-four Years of Ponderosa Pine Growth in Relation to Canopy Leaf Area and Understory Competition , 1987, Forest Science.

[45]  C. Gini.  Variabilita e Mutabilita. , 1913 .

[46]  C. T. Dyrness,et al.  Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington , 1988 .

[47]  J. Keith Gilless,et al.  Economic trade-offs of managing forests for timber production and vegetative diversity , 1994 .

[48]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[49]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Growth and yield of all-aged Douglas-fir western hemlock forest stands: a matrix model with stand diversity effects , 2005 .

[50]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[51]  C. Keylock.  Simpson diversity and the Shannon–Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy , 2005 .

[52]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[53]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[54]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Optimizing Any-Aged Management of Mixed-Species Stands: II. Effects of Decision Criteria , 1990, Forest Science.

[55]  C. Lusk,et al.  Vertical structure and basal area development in second‐growth Nothofagus stands in Chile , 2003 .

[56]  Nancy Huntly,et al.  Patterns of woody plant abundance, recruitment, mortality, and growth in a 65 year chronosequence of old-fields , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[57]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[58]  S. Pacala,et al.  Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function , 2001, Ecological Research.

[59]  T. Burk,et al.  Productivity of aspen forests in northeastern Minnesota, U.S.A., as related to stand composition and canopy structure , 2001 .

[60]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.