The goal of a future transportation architecture is an expansion in mobility, enabling new types of travel and commerce currently not affordable and thus pro- ducing induced societal benefit. From the design per- spective, the complexity, high dimensionality and di- verse nature of the design space make study of such architectures extremely difficult. An abstraction frame- work and modeling hypothesis are proposed, steps vital to the proper start of such an aggressive challenge. The core entities within a transportation architecture are abstracted: stakeholders (consumers, regulators, service providers, etc.), resources (vehicles, infrastructure, etc.) and networks (both explicit for resources and implicit for stakeholders). This abstraction leads to a general description for transportation that is useful from a con- ceptual modeling point of view - stakeholders employ particular resources, organized in networks, in order to achieve mobility objectives. The modeling hypothesis is created stemming from the description and focused upon the need to examine the architecture from a sys- tem-of-systems perspective, under the belief that the organization of transportation resources is just as im- portant as the nature and performance of those re- sources. Subsets of the methodologies are tested on three exploratory research thrusts and the findings are used to project a future path towards full validation of the modeling hypothesis. Ultimately, decision-makers at multiple levels can use the methodologies to quickly understand and visualize the relative merits of alterna- tive architectures.
[1]
J Swanson,et al.
Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World
,
2002,
J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[2]
Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.
An Integrated Decision-making Method to Identify Design Requirements Through Agent-based Simulation for Personal Air Vehicle System
,
2002
.
[3]
Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.
System of Systems Modeling for Personal Air Vehicles
,
2002
.
[4]
Piyushimita Thakuriah,et al.
Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-Oriented Approach
,
2001
.
[5]
Clayton M. Christensen.
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
,
2013
.
[6]
John D. Sterman,et al.
Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world
,
2002
.
[7]
H M Drake,et al.
Mission analysis of general aviation in the 1970's.
,
1969
.
[8]
Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.
Methodology for Examining the Simultaneous Impact of Requirements, Vehicle Characteristics, and Technologies on Military Aircraft Design
,
2000
.
[9]
Eric J. Miller,et al.
URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING: A DECISION-ORIENTED APPROACH
,
1984
.