Determination of the seismic performance factors for post‐tensioned rocking timber wall systems

Summary Post-tensioned technologies for concrete seismic resistant buildings were first developed in the 1990s during the PREcast Seismic Structural Systems program. Among different solutions, the hybrid system proved to be the most resilient solution providing a combination of re-centering and energy dissipative contributions respectively by using post-tensioned tendons and mild steel reinforcement. The system, while providing significant strength and energy dissipation, reduces structural element damage and limits post-earthquake residual displacements. More recently, the technology was extended to laminated veneer lumber (LVL) structural members, and extensive experimental and numerical work was carried out and allowed the development of reliable analytical and numerical models as well as design guidelines. On the basis of the experimental and numerical outcomes, this paper presents the evaluation of the seismic performance factors for post-tensioned rocking LVL walls using the FEMA P-695 procedure. Several archetype buildings were designed considering different parameters such as the building and story height, the type of seismic resistant system, the magnitude of gravity loads and the seismic design category. Lumped plasticity models were developed for each index archetype to simulate the behavioral aspects and collapse mechanisms. Non-linear quasi-static analyses were carried out to evaluate the system over-strength factor; moreover, non-linear time history analyses were performed using the incremental dynamic analysis concept to assess the collapse of each building. From the results of quasi-static and dynamic analyses the response modification factor, R, system over-strength factor, Ω0, and deflection amplification factor, Cd, values of, respectively, 7, 3.5 and 7.5 are recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Improved seismic performance of LVL post-tensioned walls coupled with UFP devices , 2007 .

[2]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Compressive strength and stiffness of Radiata Pine laminated veneer lumber , 2013, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[3]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Section Analysis and Cyclic Behavior of Post-Tensioned Jointed Ductile Connections for Multi-Story Timber Buildings , 2008 .

[4]  Tobias Smith,et al.  Post-tensioned Timber Frames with Supplemental Damping Devices , 2014 .

[5]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Post-Tensioned Glulam Beam-Column Joints with Advanced Damping Systems: Testing and Numerical Analysis , 2014 .

[6]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Seismic design of multi-storey buildings using Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) , 2005 .

[7]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Hysteretic dampers for earthquake‐resistant structures , 1974 .

[8]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[9]  Dion James Marriott The Development of High-Performance Post-Tensioned Rocking Systems for the Seismic Design of Structures , 2009 .

[10]  F. Mazzolani,et al.  Design of Steel Structures for Buildings in Seismic Areas: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1-1 - General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings , 2017 .

[11]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames , 2013 .

[12]  Alexander Gustav Murahidy Design, construction, dynamic testing and computer modelling of a precast prestressed reinforced concrete frame building with rocking beam-column connections and ADAS elements. , 2004 .

[13]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[14]  Bruce Lindsay Deam The seismic design and behaviour of multi-storey plywood sheathed timber framed shearwalls , 1996 .

[15]  Josef Kolb,et al.  Systems in timber engineering : loadbearing structures and component layers , 2008 .

[16]  STEFANO PAMPANIN,et al.  ANALYTICAL MODELLING OF THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF PRECAST CONCRETE FRAMES DESIGNED WITH DUCTILE CONNECTIONS , 2001 .

[17]  Frank McKenna,et al.  OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[18]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  EFFICIENCY OF SIMPLIFIED ALTERNATIVE MODELLING APPROACHES TO PREDICT THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PRECAST CONCRETE HYBRID SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[19]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Seismic response of hybrid-LVL coupled walls under quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing , 2007 .

[20]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  ANALYSIS AND SIMPLIFIED DESIGN OF PRECAST JOINTED DUCTILE CONNECTIONS , 2008 .

[21]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[22]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[23]  Mohammad Malakoutian,et al.  Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system , 2013 .

[24]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Seismic performance factors for moment frames with steel‐concrete composite columns and steel beams , 2016 .

[25]  Naohito Kawai,et al.  SOFIE project – 3D shaking table test on a seven‐storey full‐scale cross‐laminated timber building , 2013 .

[26]  M. J. Nigel Priestley,et al.  Overview of PRESSS Research Program , 1991 .