The Inflammatory Hypothesis: Any Progress in Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Targets?

About a decade ago, the prevailing wisdom was that conventional risk factors explained only about half of the risk for a myocardial infarction or stroke. However, most studies did not assess some of the newer lipid markers (such as the apolipoproteins) or measures of abdominal obesity, diet, or psychosocial factors and moreover did not try to quantify the population-attributable risk. Consequently, efforts to identify novel risk factors were undertaken to improve cardiovascular risk prediction. Article p 1591 The hypothesis that inflammation is a central contributor to atherothrombosis has stimulated sustained efforts to characterize the specific molecules and pathways that may be involved and to identify biomarkers in humans that enable detection of underlying inflammatory activation to improve cardiovascular risk prediction. Ridker and coworkers1 reported that systemic low-grade inflammation assessed by measurements of the acute-phase reactant C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with future cardiovascular events in apparently healthy individuals. This intriguing concept stimulated intense interest in further investigating the ability of inflammatory markers to add information for cardiovascular risk stratification beyond that obtained from traditional risk factors. The value of CRP for cardiovascular risk prediction has been assessed in 3 different clinical settings: apparently healthy individuals, stable patients at risk for cardiovascular events or with documented coronary heart disease, and patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. The utility of CRP for risk stratification has been proposed mainly in healthy individuals. Several large, prospective cohort studies have consistently reported that higher levels of CRP are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whereas earlier work reported a relative risk of 2.3 in the upper quintile of CRP versus the lowest, using a multivariable model including age, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, and LDL cholesterol,1,2 recent observational studies typically report much more modest relative risks of 1.3 to 1.7.3–7 …

[1]  P. Ridker,et al.  Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER)--can C-reactive protein be used to target statin therapy in primary prevention? , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  C. Meisinger,et al.  C-Reactive Protein Modulates Risk Prediction Based on the Framingham Score: Implications for Future Risk Assessment: Results From a Large Cohort Study in Southern Germany , 2004, Circulation.

[3]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study , 2004, The Lancet.

[4]  A. Hofman,et al.  High Serum C-Reactive Protein Level Is Not an Independent Predictor for Stroke: The Rotterdam Study , 2006, Circulation.

[5]  P. Ridker,et al.  Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Comparative Impact of Multiple Biomarkers and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide in the Context of Conventional Risk Factors for the Prediction of Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study , 2006, Circulation.

[7]  D. Levy,et al.  Contribution of Clinical Correlates and 13 C-Reactive Protein Gene Polymorphisms to Interindividual Variability in Serum C-Reactive Protein Level , 2006, Circulation.

[8]  Sarah Lewis,et al.  Genetic epidemiology and public health: hope, hype, and future prospects , 2005, The Lancet.

[9]  P. Whincup,et al.  Re-assessing the contribution of serum total cholesterol, blood pressure and cigarette smoking to the aetiology of coronary heart disease: impact of regression dilution bias. , 2003, European heart journal.

[10]  D. Morrow,et al.  Is C-reactive protein an innocent bystander or proatherogenic culprit?: The Verdict Is Still Out , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Steven V. Ley,et al.  Targeting C-reactive protein for the treatment of cardiovascular disease , 2006, Nature.

[13]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Interleukin-18 and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in European Men: The Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction (PRIME) , 2003, Circulation.

[14]  Vilmundur Gudnason,et al.  C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Jing Ma,et al.  Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Sabin,et al.  Transgenic human C-reactive protein is not proatherogenic in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  F. Rank,et al.  PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN THROUGH DIET AND LIFESTYLE , 2000 .

[18]  M. Pencina,et al.  C-reactive protein and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women from the Framingham Heart Study. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  Ose,et al.  Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events* , 2002 .