Mind Wandering and the Adaptive Control of Attentional Resources

Mind wandering is a natural, transient state wherein our neurocognitive systems become temporarily decoupled from the external sensory environment as our thoughts drift away from the current task at hand. Yet despite the ubiquity of mind wandering in everyday human life, we rarely seem impaired in our ability to adaptively respond to the external environment when mind wandering. This suggests that despite widespread neurocognitive decoupling during mind wandering states, we may nevertheless retain some capacity to attentionally monitor external events. But what specific capacities? In Experiment 1, using traditional performance measures, we found that both volitional and automatic forms of visual–spatial attentional orienting were significantly attenuated when mind wandering. In Experiment 2, however, ERPs revealed that, during mind wandering states, there was a relative preservation of sensitivity to deviant or unexpected sensory events, as measured via the auditory N1 component. Taken together, our findings suggest that, although some selective attentional processes may be subject to down-regulation during mind wandering, we may adaptively compensate for these neurocognitively decoupled states by maintaining automatic deviance–detection functions.

[1]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  I. Winkler,et al.  MMN and attention: competition for deviance detection. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[3]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Spontaneous attentional fluctuations in impaired states and pathological conditions: A neurobiological hypothesis , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  F. Perrin,et al.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[6]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Brain Responses to Biological Relevance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Matthew L. Dixon,et al.  A framework for understanding the relationship between externally and internally directed cognition , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory , 1994, Nature.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  H J Keselman,et al.  A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[12]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Attention and mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[13]  F. Perrin,et al.  Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  K. Paller,et al.  Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Yvonne Freeh,et al.  An R and S–PLUS Companion to Applied Regression , 2004 .

[18]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Pupillometric Evidence for the Decoupling of Attention from Perceptual Input during Offline Thought , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  Kevin Fitzpatrick,et al.  Slow Fluctuations in Attentional Control of Sensory Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[21]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[22]  D. Besner,et al.  On the link between mind wandering and task performance over time , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  Rand R. Wilcox,et al.  Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods , 2001 .

[24]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[25]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Uncovering the Neural Signature of Lapsing Attention: Electrophysiological Signals Predict Errors up to 20 s before They Occur , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  C. Escera,et al.  The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Steven P. Abney,et al.  Bootstrapping , 2002, ACL.

[31]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  U. Ligges Review of An R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression by J. Fox, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California 2002 , 2003 .

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  T. Handy,et al.  I don’t feel your pain (as much): The desensitizing effect of mind wandering on the perception of others’ discomfort , 2013, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Task unrelated thought: The role of distributed processing , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[39]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Evelyn Barron,et al.  Absorbed in Thought , 2011, Psychological science.

[42]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Differential recruitment of executive resources during mind wandering , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  T. Handy,et al.  Visual asymmetry revisited: Mind wandering preferentially disrupts processing in the left visual field , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[46]  C. Escera,et al.  Role of Mismatch Negativity and Novelty-P3 in Involuntary Auditory Attention , 2007 .

[47]  Claire Braboszcz,et al.  Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering , 2011, NeuroImage.

[48]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.