Public and stakeholder participation for managing and reducing the risks of shale gas development.

Emerging technologies pose particularly strong challenges for risk governance when they have multidimensional and inequitable impacts, when there is scientific uncertainty about the technology and its risks, when there are strong value conflicts over the perceived benefits and risks, when decisions must be made urgently, and when the decision making environment is rife with mistrust. Shale gas development is one such emerging technology. Drawing on previous U.S. National Research Council committee reports that examined risk decision making for complex issues like these, we point to the benefits and challenges of applying the analytic-deliberative process recommended in those reports for stakeholder and public engagement in risk decision making about shale gas development in the United States. We discuss the different phases of such a process and conclude by noting the dangers of allowing controversy to ossify and the benefits of sound dialogue and learning among publics, stakeholders, industry, and regulatory decision makers.

[1]  M. Brittingham,et al.  Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Richard G Newell,et al.  Implications of shale gas development for climate change. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Diego C. Cafaro,et al.  Regional variation in water-related impacts of shale gas development and implications for emerging international plays. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Air impacts of increased natural gas acquisition, processing, and use: a critical review. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Jeffrey Jacquet,et al.  Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Katherine E Konschnik,et al.  Shale gas development: a smart regulation framework. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  R. Jackson,et al.  A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Bernard D Goldstein,et al.  Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Barry G Rabe,et al.  Shale play politics: the intergovernmental Odyssey of American shale governance. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Simona L. Perry.  Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Addressing the Societal Costs of Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration and Production: A Framework for Evaluating Short-Term, Future, and Cumulative Risks and Uncertainties of Hydrofracking , 2012 .

[11]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Green Clubs: Collective Action and Voluntary Environmental Programs , 2012 .

[12]  J. Liss.  Negotiating the Marcellus: The Role of Information in Building Trust in Extractive Deals , 2011 .

[13]  Assessment of the National Wind Coordinating Collaborative: Addressing Environmental and Siting Issues Associated with Wind Energy Development , 2010 .

[14]  L. Susskind.  Complexity Science and Collaborative Decision Making , 2010 .

[15]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  GENERIC LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT SOCIETAL RESPONSES TO EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES PERCEIVED AS INVOLVING RISKS , 2009 .

[16]  P. Stern,et al.  Deliberative Methods for Understanding Environmental Systems , 2005 .

[17]  Barry L. Johnson,et al.  Essays in Commemoration of the 20th Anniversary of the National Research Council's Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 2003 .

[18]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Policy Forum Science, values, and biodiversity , 1998 .

[20]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[21]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .