Group physiotherapy provides similar outcomes for participants after joint replacement surgery as 1-to-1 physiotherapy: a sequential cohort study.

UNLABELLED Coulter CL, Weber JM, Scarvell JM. Group physiotherapy provides similar outcomes for participants after joint replacement surgery as 1-to-1 physiotherapy: a sequential cohort study. OBJECTIVES To compare effectiveness and time efficiency of physiotherapy rehabilitation provided within a group with an individualized program provided at home for improving participants' outcomes after total joint replacement surgery. DESIGN Quasiexperimental sequential cohort trial with 12-week follow-up. SETTING A tertiary acute care hospital. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients (N=51) having hip or knee replacement surgery in an 8-month period and who were able to weight-bear postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS The first group admitted to the study entered the exercise group, and patients in the following 4 months entered the home physiotherapy group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures included the Western Ontario McMaster's University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, and knee range of motion (ROM). Secondary measures included the 6-m walk test and a patient evaluation questionnaire. Staff time costs were recorded. Outcomes were recorded preoperatively or at hospital discharge, and 5 and 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS There was no difference between the 2 groups for either the WOMAC or SF-36 scores, 6-m walk test, TUG test, or ROM measures at 12 weeks (P>.05), although both groups of patients improved between hospital discharge and 12 weeks. The class group accessed more frequent physiotherapy than the home group (mean, 7.5 and 3.96 visits, respectively). The physiotherapist's time was less per patient per visit for the class group (mean, 27min direct and 10min indirect) than for the home visits (mean, 38min direct and 26min indirect). CONCLUSIONS This trial suggests that the class-based exercise rehabilitation was the most efficient method of delivery of the physiotherapy service, without cost to patient outcomes.

[1]  A. Silman,et al.  Supplementing a home exercise programme with a class-based exercise programme is more effective than home exercise alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[2]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain: A cluster randomized trial , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  J. Judge,et al.  The Performance Enhancement Project: improving physical performance in older persons. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  H. Shimada,et al.  Specific effects of balance and gait exercises on physical function among the frail elderly , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Woolf,et al.  Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. , 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[6]  P. Goldie,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation: choosing a discriminative measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[8]  J. Crosbie,et al.  Status of physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee replacement in Australia. , 2006, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[9]  E. Carmeli,et al.  A comparative study of organized class-based exercise programs versus individual home-based exercise programs for elderly patients following hip surgery , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  Hélène Moffet,et al.  Effectiveness of intensive rehabilitation on functional ability and quality of life after first total knee arthroplasty: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  J Perry,et al.  Functional evaluation of total hip arthroplasty with five- to ten-year follow-up evaluation. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Janeane L. Walker,et al.  Costs and effectiveness of pre- and post-operative home physiotherapy for total knee replacement: randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[16]  R. Bourne,et al.  Comparison of Clinic- and Home-Based Rehabilitation Programs After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  L. Mollinger,et al.  Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. , 2002, Physical therapy.