Retreatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Patients Randomized by Coiling or Clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT)

Background and Purpose— Because the long-term security of endovascular treatments remains uncertain, a follow-up study of the patients treated in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial was performed to compare the frequency, timing, and consequences of aneurysm recurrence. Methods— Patient data were reclassified by actual treatment performed. Aneurysm and patient characteristics, including occlusion grades, time and type of retreatment, and clinical outcomes, were compared. The relationship between these variables and late retreatment as a surrogate for recurrence was analyzed by means of the Cox proportional hazards model. Results— Retreatment was performed in 191 of 1096 (17.4%) patients after primary endovascular coiling (EVT) and in 39 of 1012 patients (3.8%) after neurosurgical clipping. After EVT, 97 (8.8%) patients were retreated early and 94 (9.0%) late, 7 (0.6%) after rebleeding and 87 (8.3%) without. The mean time to late retreatment was 20.7 months. After neurosurgical clipping, 30 (2.9%) patients were retreated early and 9 (0.85%) late, 3 (0.3%) after rebleeding and 6 (0.6%) without. The mean time to late retreatment was 5.7 months. The hazard ratio (HR) for retreatment after EVT was 6.9 (95% CI=3.4 to 14.1) after adjustment for age (P=0.001, HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95 to 0.98), lumen size (P=0.006, HR=1.1, 95% CI=1.03 to 1.18), and incomplete occlusion (P<0.001, HR=7.6, 95% CI=3.3 to 17.5). Conclusions— Late retreatment was 6.9 times more likely after EVT. Younger age, larger lumen size, and incomplete occlusion were risk factors for late retreatment after EVT. After neurosurgical clipping, retreatments were earlier; whereas EVT retreatments continued to be performed throughout the follow-up period. Short-term follow-up imaging is therefore insufficient to detect recurrences after EVT.

[1]  A. Algra,et al.  Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  Laurent Spelle,et al.  Endovascular treatment with coils of 149 middle cerebral artery berry aneurysms. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  A. Algra,et al.  Follow-up screening after subarachnoid haemorrhage: frequency and determinants of new aneurysms and enlargement of existing aneurysms. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  P. Sandercock,et al.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion , 2005, The Lancet.

[5]  Menno Sluzewski,et al.  The relation between packing and reopening in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study , 2005, Neuroradiology.

[6]  J. Gabrillargues,et al.  A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  G. Rinkel,et al.  New Detected Aneurysms on Follow-Up Screening in Patients With Previously Clipped Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison With DSA or CTA at the Time of SAH , 2005, Stroke.

[8]  Yutaka Kai,et al.  Evaluation of the Stability of Small Ruptured Aneurysms with a Small Neck after Embolization with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Correlation between Coil Packing Ratio and Coil Compaction , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[9]  A. Gruber,et al.  GDC-system embolization for brain aneurysms — Location and follow-up , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  G. Rinkel,et al.  Additional coiling of previously coiled cerebral aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  C. Slump,et al.  Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  D. Stolke,et al.  Recurrent hemorrhage after initially complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms , 2003, Neurosurgical Review.

[13]  J. Lamoureux,et al.  Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable Coils , 2003, Stroke.

[14]  Yuichi Murayama,et al.  Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  A. Molyneux International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[16]  H. Abe,et al.  Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  A. Itoh,et al.  [Craniotomy side for neck clipping of the anterior communicating aneurysm via the pterional approach]. , 2002, No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery.

[18]  J. Ausman,et al.  Follow-up Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Placement of Guglielmi Detachable Coils , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[19]  N. Hashimoto,et al.  Endovascular Occlusion of Intracranial Aneurysms with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Correlation Between Coil Packing Density and Coil Compaction , 2001, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[20]  F Viñuela,et al.  Natural history of the neck remnant of a cerebral aneurysm treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil system. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  R. Vanninen,et al.  Outcomes of Early Endovascular Versus Surgical Treatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: A Prospective Randomized Study , 2000, Stroke.

[22]  R. Higashida,et al.  Endovascular treatment of ruptured posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic outcomes. , 2000, Stroke.

[23]  M. Lawton,et al.  Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  J Moret,et al.  Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  A J Molyneux,et al.  Factors influencing successful angiographic occlusion of aneurysms treated by coil embolization. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  F Viñuela,et al.  Embolization of incidental cerebral aneurysms by using the Guglielmi detachable coil system. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  A. Molyneux,et al.  Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  A. Algra,et al.  Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. , 1999, Stroke.

[29]  G. Nesbit,et al.  Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: a single-center experience. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[30]  S. Yagihashi,et al.  Rerupture of coil-embolized aneurysm during long-term observation. Case report. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  D. Roy,et al.  Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[32]  H. Ellis stroke , 1997, The Lancet.

[33]  R. Macdonald,et al.  Role of angiography following aneurysm surgery. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[34]  A. Fox,et al.  Regrowth of aneurysm sacs from residual neck following aneurysm clipping. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[35]  M. Cowan,et al.  American Heart Association. , 2018, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[36]  C. Lindquist,et al.  Natural history of postoperative aneurysm rests. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  J. Rankin Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis , 1957, Scottish medical journal.