Group Versus Individual Decision Making

This study examines the effect of accountability and gender on the development of group-think In addition, group decision making is contrasted with individual decision making. For groups, individual and collective accountabilityaredistinguished. It is argued that structures of accountability, by counteracting two important antecedent conditions of groupthink, can reduce groupthink tendencies. The results confirm this prediction but do not support the hypothesis that individual accountability will be more effective than collective accountability. As expected, male groups are more affected by accountability than female groups are. Differences between group and individual task performance were only found for men. Imnplications forfuture research on groupthink andfor practice are discussed

[1]  D. V. Kreveld,et al.  MANAGING GROUP DECISION MAKING PROCESSES: INDIVIDUAL VERSUS COLLECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY AND GROUPTHINK , 1991 .

[2]  Clark McCauley,et al.  The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. , 1989 .

[3]  Charles R. Schwenk Effects of Devil's Advocacy on Escalating Commitment , 1988 .

[4]  Elizabeth Weldon,et al.  Cognitive Loafing , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[5]  W. Wood,et al.  Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making during International Crises , 1987 .

[7]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Why Informed Groups Make Faulty Decisions , 1987 .

[8]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[9]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[10]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Effects of dominance on group decision making: toward a stress-reduction explanation of groupthink. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Carrie R. Leana A Partial Test of Janis' Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making , 1985 .

[12]  K. Deaux From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[13]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making , 1984 .

[14]  P. Mosley ‘Popularity Functions’ and the Role of the Media: A Pilot Study of the Popular Press , 1984, British Journal of Political Science.

[15]  P. Tetlock Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[16]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[17]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? , 1983 .

[18]  Gregory Moorhead,et al.  Groupthink: Hypothesis in Need of Testing , 1982 .

[19]  W. Koomen A note on the analysis of group data , 1982 .

[20]  G. W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[21]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[22]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Identifying Victims of Groupthink From Public Statements of Decision Makers , 1979 .

[23]  Daniel W. McAllister,et al.  The Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies: An Empirical Test. , 1978 .

[24]  John A. Courtright,et al.  A laboratory investigation of groupthink , 1978 .

[25]  George Cvetkovich,et al.  Cognitive accommodation, language, and social responsibility. , 1978 .

[26]  Matie L. Flowers A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. , 1977 .

[27]  J. M. Rabbie,et al.  Intergroup competition and its effect on intragroup and intergroup relations , 1971 .

[28]  H. Lodewijkx,et al.  20 – Sex Differences in Conflict and Aggression in Individual and Group Settings , 1992 .

[29]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Sex differences in group task performance. , 1985 .

[30]  E. Fodor,et al.  The power motive as an influence on group decision making. , 1982 .

[31]  L. R. Hoffman Group Problem Solving1 , 1965 .