Measuring low permeabilities of gas-sands and shales using a pressure transmission technique

Abstract Liquid and gas permeability measurements for tight gas-sand and shales were done using a pressure transmission technique in specially designed apparatus in which confining pressure, pore pressure, and temperature are independently controlled. Downstream pressure changes were measured after increasing and maintaining upstream pressure constant. The initial pressure difference changes only after the pressure pulse propagates across the sample. For low permeability samples, the downstream pressure increase is delayed but the measurement senses a greater sample volume. On the other hand, conventional pulse decay techniques provide a more rapid response but are sensitive to local sample permeability heterogeneity. Permeability measured for the rocks studied varies from 1.18×10−15 to 3.95×10−21 m2. The measured permeability anisotropy ratio in gas shale varies from 20% to 31%. The magnitudes of permeability anisotropy remain almost constant, but the absolute permeability values decrease by a factor of 10 with a 29.79 MPa effective pressure. All samples showed a nonlinear reduction in permeability with increasing effective pressure. The rate of reduction is markedly different from sample to sample and with flow direction. This reduction can be described by a cubic k–σ law and explained by preferential flow through microcracks.

[1]  M. E. Hanson,et al.  Effects of Various Parameters on Hydraulic Fracturing Geometry , 1981 .

[2]  Jairam Kamath,et al.  Characterization of Core Scale Heterogeneities Using Laboratory Pressure Transients , 1992 .

[3]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  EFFECTIVE STRESS LAW FOR THE PERMEABILITY OF CLAY-RICH SANDSTONES , 2004 .

[4]  Bruce E. Herbert,et al.  Permeability of illite-bearing shale: 1. Anisotropy and effects of clay content and loading , 2004 .

[5]  Permeability measurement by the pulse-decay method: Effects of poroelastic phenomena and non-linear pore pressure diffusion , 1986 .

[6]  L. Klinkenberg The Permeability Of Porous Media To Liquids And Gases , 2012 .

[7]  R. M. Bustin,et al.  Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications , 2009 .

[8]  D. Trimmer,et al.  Design criteria for laboratory measurements of low permeability rocks , 1981 .

[9]  F. Javadpour,et al.  Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments , 2007 .

[10]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Modification of Darcy's law for the threshold pressure gradient , 1999 .

[11]  Jean-Claude Roegiers,et al.  Permeability Tensors of Anisotropic Fracture Networks , 1999 .

[12]  J. Ahn,et al.  Textures in Layered Silicates: Progressive Changes Through Diagenesis and Low-Temperature Metamorphism , 1985 .

[13]  S. C. Jones A Rapid Accurate Unsteady-State Klinkenberg Permeameter , 1972 .

[14]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  Permeability of granite under high pressure , 1968 .

[15]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Geologic disposal of high-level radioactive wastes; earth-science perspectives , 1978 .

[16]  Wunan Lin Parametric analyses of the transient method of measuring permeability , 1982 .

[17]  S. C. Jones A Technique for Faster Pulse-Decay Permeability Measurements in Tight Rocks , 1997 .

[18]  Ming Zhang,et al.  EVALUATION AND APPLICATION OF THE TRANSIENT-PULSE TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING THE HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF LOW-PERMEABILITY ROCKS-PART 2: EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATION , 2000 .

[19]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .

[20]  K. Cashman,et al.  Permeability of anisotropic tube pumice: Model calculations and measurements , 2006 .

[21]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  A Transient Laboratory Method for Determining the Hydraulic Properties of "Tight"Rocks-I, Theory , 1981 .

[22]  J. B. Walsh The effect of cracks on the compressibility of rock , 1965 .

[23]  Andrew C. Aplin,et al.  Compaction‐driven evolution of porosity and permeability in natural mudstones: An experimental study , 1998 .

[24]  E. Oort A novel technique for the investigation of drilling fluid induced borehole instability in shales , 1994 .

[25]  A. I. Dicker,et al.  A Practical Approach for Determining Permeability From Laboratory Pressure-Pulse Decay Measurements , 1988 .

[26]  C. W. Hopkins,et al.  Matrix Permeability Measurement of Gas Productive Shales , 1993 .

[27]  A. Bespalov,et al.  On the Relationship between Resistivity and Permeability Anisotropy , 2002 .

[28]  R. W. Ostensen Microcrack Permeability in Tight Gas Sandstone , 1983 .

[29]  M. Zamora,et al.  Permeability anisotropy and its relations with porous medium structure , 2008 .

[30]  J. W. Martin,et al.  Pore geometry and transport properties of Fontainebleau sandstone , 1993 .

[31]  N. F. Smyth,et al.  One‐dimensional fluid diffusion induced by constant‐rate flow injection: Theoretical analysis and application to the determination of fluid permeability and specific storage of a cored rock sample , 2004 .

[32]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  EFFECT OF PORE PRESSURE AND CONFINING PRESSURE ON FRACTURE PERMEABILITY , 1981 .

[33]  F. O. Jr. Jones,et al.  A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Confining Pressure on Fracture Flow and Storage Capacity in Carbonate Rocks , 1973 .

[34]  Daniel J. Soeder,et al.  Porosity and Permeability of Eastern Devonian Gas Shale , 1988 .

[35]  W. W. Owens,et al.  A Laboratory Study of Low-Permeability Gas Sands , 1980 .