Single Cells versus Neuronal Assemblies

I wrote a paper almost 20 years ago (Barlow 1972) that was intended to promote the approach to brain function at the level of single neurons, and to act as an antidote to the view that, since there are so many cells in the brain, it is useless to consider what a single one of them does. Though it was aimed at those who advocated the “mass action” approach, in which one records evoked potentials in the hope that the averaged activity of many cells will be meaningful, quite a lot of what I said still seems to me correct and relevant, though what I then regarded as the unenlightened opposition now tends to put its faith in “neuronal assemblies” and “synfire groups” instead of “mass action”. Perhaps its therefore worth raising some of the points again.

[1]  H. Barlow,et al.  Responses to single quanta of light in retinal ganglion cells of the cat. , 1971, Vision research.

[2]  S. McKee,et al.  Visual acuity in the presence of retinal-image motion. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision , 1989, Nature.

[4]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[5]  H. Barlow,et al.  Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[7]  D. Burr Acuity for apparent vernier offset , 1979, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Parker,et al.  Capabilities of monkey cortical cells in spatial-resolution tasks. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.