Development of a measure to assess the impact of epilepsy on people with an intellectual disability: the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale - Client version (GEOS-C).

BACKGROUND Epilepsy is common in people with intellectual disability, yet clinicians and researchers seldom obtain information directly from the client. The development and preliminary validation of a novel measure for use with people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities is described. METHODS Focus group methods (6 groups; 24 participants) identified issues of concern, and qualitative analysis (NUD*IST) was applied to derive items and themes for a draft scale. Psychometric scale development techniques were then used in a pilot study and subsequent field-testing to investigate validity and reliability (n = 46). RESULTS A total of 148 issues of concern was reduced initially to 52 and then to 42 items using these methods. The derived scale comprised sub-scales reflecting (1) concerns about having seizures; (2) about injury; (3) about issues during; and (4) after seizures; (5) about medication; (6) about what people think; and (7) about daily life. Cronbach alpha for the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale - Client version (GEOS-C) was 0.92, and ranged from 0.64-0.81 for the sub-scales. Relatively weak associations (r <or= 0.40), between client and family carer, staff carer or clinician views, suggests that proxy reports are not good predictors of how people with epilepsy themselves are feeling. Preliminary validation suggests that the GEOS-C can discriminate on variables of clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS The GEOS-C complements existing GEOS measures, can be completed in 5-15 min depending upon the level of support required, and may provide a valuable clinical and research tool. Further validational work and appraisal of sensitivity are required.

[1]  R Duncan,et al.  Psychopathology in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability; an investigation of potential explanatory variables , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  C. Espie,et al.  Perspectives on epilepsy in people with intellectual disabilities: comparison of family carer, staff carer and clinician score profiles on the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale (GEOS) , 2003, Seizure.

[3]  R. Willke,et al.  Measuring agreement between patient and proxy responses to multidimensional health-related quality-of-life measures in clinical trials. An application of psychometric profile analysis. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  C. Espie,et al.  Adults with learning disabilities and epilepsy: knowledge about epilepsy before and after an educational package , 2001, Seizure.

[5]  A. Marson,et al.  Clinical guidelines for the management of epilepsy in adults with an intellectual disability , 2001, Seizure.

[6]  M. Brodie,et al.  Development and Validation of the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale (GEOS): A New Instrument for Measuring Concerns about Epilepsy in People with Mental Retardation , 2001, Epilepsia.

[7]  M. Kerr,et al.  Epilepsy and intellectual disability. , 2000, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[8]  C. Espie,et al.  The Epilepsy Outcome Scale: the development of a measure for use with carers of people with epilepsy plus intellectual disability. , 1998, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

[9]  Martin J. Brodie,et al.  Epilepsy and learning disabilities—a challenge for the next millennium? , 1998, Seizure.

[10]  G. Baker,et al.  Development of a Novel Scale to Assess Life Fulfilment as Part of the Further Refinement of a Quality‐of‐Life Model for Epilepsy , 1994, Epilepsia.

[11]  W. Hauser,et al.  Prevalence of Epilepsy in Rochester, Minnesota: 1940–1980 , 1991, Epilepsia.