The Persuasive Power of Human-Machine Dialogue

The persuasive power of live interaction is hard to match, yet technologies are increasingly taking on roles to promote behavioral change. We believe that speech-based interfaces offer a compelling mode of interaction for engaging users and are motivated to understand how to best present persuasive information using speech interaction. We present a study comparing the persuasive power of two speech-based information systems, one which uses a recorded message-based lecture presentation and another which uses an interactive dialogic presentation. We measure the persuasive power across both conditions using a survival task. We find that the dialogic system is significantly more persuasive than the lecture system. We also find that the dialogic system presents significantly (almost four times) less information than the lecture system. We analyze our results using three standard rank correlation methods. We point to limitations of these measures and propose a new metric which appears to be more sensitive for this task.

[1]  A. C. Elms Influence of fantasy ability on attitude change through role playing. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Jay Hall,et al.  The Effects of a Normative Intervention on Group Decision-Making Performance , 1970 .

[3]  R. Graham,et al.  Spearman's Footrule as a Measure of Disarray , 1977 .

[4]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[5]  P. Good Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses (Springer Series in Statistics) , 1994 .

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[7]  P. Good Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses , 2005 .

[8]  J. Brug,et al.  The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[9]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[10]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[11]  Jan Maarten Schraagen,et al.  Seeing is believing: communication performance under isotropic teleconferencing conditions , 2001 .

[12]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception , 2002, CSCW '02.

[13]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[14]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  Technology Adds New Principles to Persuasive Psychology: Evidence from Health Education , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[15]  Pål Kraft,et al.  Digital Therapy: The Coming Together of Psychology and Technology Can Create a New Generation of Programs for More Sustainable Behavioral Change , 2007, PERSUASIVE.

[16]  S. Davis Internet-Based Tailored Health Communications: History and Theoretical Foundations , 2007 .