High-Definition Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Stents Imaging Compared With Standard-Definition 64-Row Multidectector Computed Tomography: An Initial in Vivo Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jian Ying Li | Ke-min Chen | Yan Liu | Z. Pan | Huan Zhang | Hua Xiao | W. Yang
[1] H. Kauczor,et al. In vitro evaluation of 56 coronary artery stents by 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT. , 2011, European journal of radiology.
[2] J. Gudjónsdóttir,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. , 2010, European journal of radiology.
[3] G. Feuchtner,et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode , 2010, European Radiology.
[4] C. Herzog,et al. In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with 64-MDCT using an ECG-gated cardiac phantom: relationship between in-stent visualization, stent type, and heart rate. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5] J. Min,et al. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[6] T. Villines,et al. International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[7] Zhonghua Sun,et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of radiology.
[8] F. Eberli,et al. Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2008, The Lancet.
[9] C. Catalano,et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography , 2008, European Radiology.
[10] Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] A. El-Menyar,et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. , 2007, Radiology.
[12] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. , 2007, Radiology.
[13] Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.
[14] Mahadevappa Mahesh,et al. Physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[15] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] D. Oncel,et al. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.
[17] Yasuyuki Suzuki,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. , 2006, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.
[18] Rainer Raupach,et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents , 2006, European Radiology.
[19] P. Serruys,et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, JAMA.
[20] W. Heindel,et al. 64- Versus 16-Slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Stent Assessment: In Vitro Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[21] S. Furui,et al. Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel, and vessel orientation to the z-axis. , 2005, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.
[22] Charles L. Brown,et al. Analysis of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes in the SIRIUS Trial: A Randomized Trial of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Standard Stent in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Restenosis , 2004, Circulation.
[23] N. Paul,et al. Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.