High-Definition Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Stents Imaging Compared With Standard-Definition 64-Row Multidectector Computed Tomography: An Initial in Vivo Study

Objective The evaluation of coronary stents by computed tomography (CT) remains difficult. We assessed the imaging performance of a high-definition CT scanner (HDCT) by comparing with a conventional 64-row standard-definition CT (SDCT). Methods One hundred thirty-eight consecutive stented patients underwent coronary CT angiography, among whom 66 patients were examined by HDCT, and 72 patients by SDCT (LightSpeed VCT XT; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis). The image quality score, the inner stent diameter (ISD), and the radiation dose were analyzed. All data were statistically tested by SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Results In 72 patients examined using SDCT, 135 stents were detected; in 66 patients examined using HDCT, 119 stents were detected. The image quality score on HDCT was significantly better than that on SDCT (1.4 [SD, 0.7] vs 1.9 [SD, 0.8]). The ISD on HDCT was significantly higher than that on SDCT (1.8 [SD, 0.5] vs 1.6 [SD, 0.4]). There was no significant difference of either image quality score or ISD between the HDCT and SDCT groups in stents with 2.5-mm diameter. Images on HDCT showed significantly better image quality score and larger ISD than images on SDCT in 2.75-, 3-, and 3.5-mm stents. For patients examined by retrospective electrocardiogram-gated technique, the radiation dose on HDCT was significantly lower than that on SDCT (11.3 [SD, 2.9] vs 15.1 [SD, 3.8] mSv). Conclusions High-definition CT scanner offered improved image quality and measurement accuracy for imaging coronary stents compared with conventional SDCT, providing higher spatial resolution and lower dose for evaluating coronary stents with 2.75- to 3.5-mm diameter.

[1]  H. Kauczor,et al.  In vitro evaluation of 56 coronary artery stents by 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[2]  J. Gudjónsdóttir,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[3]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode , 2010, European Radiology.

[4]  C. Herzog,et al.  In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with 64-MDCT using an ECG-gated cardiac phantom: relationship between in-stent visualization, stent type, and heart rate. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Min,et al.  High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  T. Villines,et al.  International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[7]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[8]  F. Eberli,et al.  Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Catalano,et al.  Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[10]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  A. El-Menyar,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. , 2007, Radiology.

[12]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. , 2007, Radiology.

[13]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Mahadevappa Mahesh,et al.  Physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  D. Oncel,et al.  Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[17]  Yasuyuki Suzuki,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. , 2006, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[18]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents , 2006, European Radiology.

[19]  P. Serruys,et al.  Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[20]  W. Heindel,et al.  64- Versus 16-Slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Stent Assessment: In Vitro Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[21]  S. Furui,et al.  Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel, and vessel orientation to the z-axis. , 2005, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[22]  Charles L. Brown,et al.  Analysis of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes in the SIRIUS Trial: A Randomized Trial of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Standard Stent in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Restenosis , 2004, Circulation.

[23]  N. Paul,et al.  Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.