High performers in complex spatial systems: a self-organizing mapping approach with reference to The Netherlands

This paper addresses the performance of creative firms from the perspective of complex spatial systems. Based on an extensive high-dimensional database on both the attributes of individual creative firms in the Netherlands and a series of detailed regional facilitating and driving factors related, inter alia, to talent, innovation, skills, networks, accessibility and hardware, a new methodology called self-organizing mapping is applied to identify and explain in virtual topological space, the relative differences between these firms and their business performance in various regions. It turns out that there are significant differences in the spatial and functional profile of large firms vis-à-vis SMEs across distinct geographical areas in the country.

[1]  Roberta Capello,et al.  Entrepreneurship and spatial externalities: Theory and measurement , 2002 .

[2]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Regional Efficiency Improvement by Means of Data Envelopment Analysis through Euclidean Distance Minimization including Fixed Input Factors - An Application to Tourist Regions in Italy , 2011 .

[3]  M. Berry,et al.  Combining technology and corporate strategy in small high tech firms , 1998 .

[4]  Giovanni Prarolo,et al.  HWWI Research Paper , 2008 .

[5]  André de Waal.  Strategic performance management , 2013 .

[6]  Ana Salomé García Muñiz,et al.  Spanish and European innovation diffusion: a structural hole approach in the input–output field , 2010 .

[7]  Marina van Geenhuizen,et al.  Modelling dynamics of knowledge networks and local connectedness: a case study of urban high-tech companies in The Netherlands , 2007 .

[8]  Sarah Cooper,et al.  The Impact of `Incubator' Organizations on Opportunity Recognition and Technology Innovation in New, Entrepreneurial High-technology Ventures , 2008 .

[9]  Chris C. Miller.  The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators , 2001 .

[10]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Social area analysis, data mining, and GIS , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[11]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The Relationship between the Level of Completeness of a Strategic Performance Management System and Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages , 2009 .

[12]  Gerard J. van den Berg,et al.  Duration models: specification, identification and multiple durations , 2000 .

[13]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Entrepreneurship, Creativity, and Regional Economic Growth , 2003 .

[14]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Regional Efficiency Improvement by Means of Data Envelopment Analysis Through Euclidean Distance Minimization Including Fixed Input Factors – an Application to Tourist Regions in Italy , 2011 .

[15]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe , 2005 .

[16]  Billy Matheson,et al.  A culture of creativity: design education and the creative industries , 2006 .

[17]  M. Partridge,et al.  Creating the Cultural Community: Ethnic Diversity vs. Agglomeration , 2011 .

[18]  Michael Bommer,et al.  The innovation work environment of high–tech SMEs in the USA and Canada , 2002 .

[19]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Smart cities in perspective – a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps , 2012 .

[20]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A Generalized Goals-achievement Model in Data Envelopment Analysis: an Application to Efficiency Improvement in Local Government Finance in Japan , 2009 .

[21]  Ray Oakey,et al.  Clustering and the R&D Management of High-Technology Small Firms: In Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[22]  O. J. Vrieze,et al.  Kohonen Network , 1995, Artificial Neural Networks.

[23]  Karima Kourtit,et al.  In Search of Incredible Cities by Means of Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (Urban Systems and Quality of Life) , 2012 .

[24]  Michael Sonis,et al.  Economic complexity as network complication: Multiregional input-output structural path analysis , 1998 .

[25]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[26]  M. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[27]  Gerhard Untiedt,et al.  Are there really high-tech clusters? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants , 2006 .

[28]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics , 2011 .

[29]  Pragya Agarwal,et al.  Introduction: What is a Self‐Organizing Map? , 2008 .

[30]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Universities and local economic development: The case of Linköping , 1997 .

[31]  A. Skupin,et al.  Self-organising maps : applications in geographic information science , 2008 .

[32]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Complexity and spatial networks : in search of simplicity , 2009 .

[33]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  XXQ FACTORS FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT: A SYSTEMS ECONOMICS VIEW , 2008 .

[34]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Regional Foundations of Competitiveness Issues for Wales , 2002 .

[35]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The Economy of Cities , 1969 .

[36]  Yannick Lung,et al.  Complexity and spatial dynamics modelling. From catastrophe theory to self-organizing process: A review of the literature , 1988 .

[37]  Harold Miles.  The Road to Riches , 1993 .

[38]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A stepwise-projection data envelopment analysis for public transport operations in Japan , 2011 .

[39]  P. Krugman.  The Self Organizing Economy , 1996 .

[40]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Visual Data Mining in Spatial Interaction Analysis with Self-Organizing Maps , 2009 .

[41]  G. Duranton,et al.  Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies , 2003 .

[42]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  GeoComputational modelling : techniques and applications , 2001 .

[43]  Karima Kourtit,et al.  Strategic Performance Management in Practice: Advantages, Disadvantages and Reasons for Use , 2008 .

[44]  D. Bayliss.  The Rise of the Creative City: Culture and Creativity in Copenhagen , 2007 .

[45]  R. Atkinson.  The Flight of the Creative Class , 2006 .

[46]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A distance friction minimization approach in data envelopment analysis: A comparative study on airport efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The Emergence of the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[48]  Luigi Fusco Girard,et al.  Smart Policy, Creative Strategy and Urban Development , 2006 .

[49]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  From islands of innovation to creative hotspots , 2011 .

[50]  Jamie Peck.  Struggling with the Creative Class , 2005 .

[51]  William M. Bowen,et al.  Urban spatial pattern as self-organizing system: An empirical evaluation of firm location decisions in Cleveland–Akron PMSA, Ohio , 2007 .

[52]  K. Pavitt.  What We Know about the Strategic Management of Technology , 1990 .

[53]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multidimensional urban sprawl in Europe: A self-organizing map approach , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[54]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[55]  Richard Florida,et al.  Creativity and Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis of New Firm Formation , 2004 .

[56]  Daniel Felsenstein,et al.  Do high technology agglomerations encourage urban sprawl? , 2002 .

[57]  Timothy R. Wojan,et al.  Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties , 2007 .

[58]  Edward M. Mone,et al.  Strategic Performance Management , 2008 .

[59]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[60]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Computational Neural Networks — Tools for Spatial Data Analysis , 2001 .

[61]  Ǻ. Andersson.  Creativity and regional development , 1985 .

[62]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Creativity and Diversity: Strategic Performance Management of High-Tech SMEs in Dutch Urban Areas , 2011 .

[63]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Regional development as self-ogranized converging growth , 2007 .

[64]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  An Agent-Based Decision Support Model for the Development of E-Services in the Tourist Sector , 2009 .

[65]  André Skupin,et al.  Visualizing Demographic Trajectories with Self-Organizing Maps , 2005, GeoInformatica.