Sembowser - Semantic Biological Web Services Registry

There are now more than a thousand Web Services [22] offering access to disparate biological resources namely data and computational tools. It is extremely difficult for biological researchers to search in a Web Services (WS) registry for a relevant WS using the standard (primarily computational) descriptions used to describe it. Semantic Biological Web Services Registry (SemBOWSER) is an ontology-based implementation of the UDDI specification, which enables, at present, glycoproteomics researchers to publish, search and discover WS using semantic, service-level, descriptive domain keywords. SemBOWSER classifies a WS along two dimensions- the task they implement and the domain they are associated with. Each published WS is associated with the relevant ProPreO (comprehensive process ontology for glycoproteomics experimental lifecycle) ontology-based keywords (implemented as part of the registry). A researcher, in turn, can search for relevant WS using only the descriptive keywords, part of their everyday working lexicon. This intuitive search is underpinned by the ProPreO ontology, thereby making use of the inherent advantages of a semantic search, as compared to a purely syntactic search, namely disambiguation and use of named relationships between concepts. SemBOWSER is part of the glycoproteomics web portal’ stargate’.

[1]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Interoperability of Web Services - Challenges and Experiences , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06).

[2]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Knowledge modeling and its application in life sciences: a tale of two ontologies , 2006, WWW '06.

[4]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Modeling Quality of Service for Workflows and Web Service Processes , 2002 .

[5]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  SemRank: ranking complex relationship search results on the semantic web , 2005, WWW '05.

[6]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic WS-agreement partner selection , 2006, WWW '06.

[7]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Meteor-s web service annotation framework , 2004, WWW '04.

[8]  Phillip Lord,et al.  Describing Web Services for User-Oriented Retrieval , 2005 .

[9]  Carole Goble Using the Semantic Web for e-Science: Inspiration, Incubation, Irritation (Extended Abstract) , 2005 .

[10]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Basic Formal Ontology for bioinformatics , 2005 .

[11]  José Francisco Aldana Montes,et al.  Intelligent client for integrating bioinformatics services , 2006, Bioinform..

[12]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Ranking complex relationships on the semantic Web , 2005, IEEE Internet Computing.

[14]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Feta: A Light-Weight Architecture for User Oriented Semantic Service Discovery , 2005, ESWC.

[16]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION: PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE Concurrency Computat.: Pract. Exper. 2000; 00:1–7 Prepared using cpeauth.cls [Version: 2002/09/19 v2.02] Taverna: Lessons in creating , 2022 .

[17]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Processes Driving the Networked Economy , 1999, IEEE Concurr..

[18]  Jos de Bruijn,et al.  Web Service Modeling Ontology , 2005, Appl. Ontology.

[19]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Applying Semantic Web Services to Bioinformatics: Experiences Gained, Lessons Learnt , 2004, SEMWEB.

[20]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Using the Semantic Web for e-Science: Inspiration, Incubation, Irritation , 2005, SEMWEB.