EMG-triggered electrical stimulation is a feasible intervention to apply to multiple arm muscles in people early after stroke, but does not improve strength and activity more than usual therapy: a randomized feasibility trial

Objective: To determine whether EMG-triggered electrical stimulation applied to multiple muscles daily is a feasible intervention and to determine its effect on strength and activity in very weak stroke patients. Design: A prospective, randomized trial with blinded assessment. Setting: Metropolitan mixed acute and rehabilitation units. Participants: Thirty-three people within four weeks of a stroke with less than Grade 3 strength in three out of four muscle groups (shoulder flexors, elbow extensors, wrist and finger extensors and thumb abductors) of the affected arm. Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to receive EMG-triggered electrical stimulation to the four muscle groups of the affected arm plus usual therapy five times a week for four weeks, or usual therapy only. Main measures: Feasibility of the intervention was measured by examining compliance with the trial protocol. Strength was measured using manual muscle testing summed across muscle groups (0–20). Activity was measured using the Motor Assessment Scale, summed upper limb items (0–18). Results: The experimental group received 87% of the intervention. Following the intervention period, there was no difference between the groups for strength (mean between-group difference, 0 out of 20, 95% confidence interval (CI) −3 to 3, p = 0.91) or activity (mean between-group difference 1 out of 18, 95% CI −2 to 4, p = 0.44). Conclusions: It is feasible to apply EMG-triggered electrical stimulation to multiple muscles of the upper limb in very weak people early after stroke. However, it does not appear to improve strength or activity beyond usual arm therapy that contains strengthening.

[1]  Janice J. Eng,et al.  Strength Training Improves Upper-Limb Function in Individuals With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, Stroke.

[2]  T. Hosokawa,et al.  Relationship of muscle strength for knee extension to walking capacity in patients with spastic hemiparesis. , 1985, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  K.,et al.  Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. , 2000, Age and ageing.

[4]  L. Ada,et al.  Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. , 2006, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[5]  R. Nakamura,et al.  Determinants of Maximum Walking Speed in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients , 1994 .

[6]  E. G. Cruz,et al.  Weakness is the primary contributor to finger impairment in chronic stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  E H Wagner,et al.  Evidence for a non-linear relationship between leg strength and gait speed. , 1996, Age and ageing.

[8]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients , 1998 .

[9]  R. Waters,et al.  Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Richard W. Bohannon.  Muscle strength and muscle training after stroke. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  T. V. Stockert,et al.  EMG-triggered electrical muscle stimulation in the treatment of central hemiparesis after a stroke , 1997 .

[12]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[13]  Amy L Shortal.  Recovery of Walking Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1996 .

[14]  P. Winchester,et al.  Effects of feedback stimulation training and cyclical electrical stimulation on knee extension in hemiparetic patients. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[15]  D. Newham,et al.  Science based rehabilitation - Theories into practice , 2005 .

[16]  D H Nielsen,et al.  Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[17]  L. Ada,et al.  Chapter 5 – Changing the way we view the contribution of motor impairments to physical disability after stroke , 2005 .

[18]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  L. Ada,et al.  Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  P. Friedman.  Spatial neglect in acute stroke: the line bisection test. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  L. Ada,et al.  Relation between spasticity, weakness and contracture of the elbow flexors and upper limb activity after stroke: An observational study , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  Louise Ada,et al.  The Tardieu Scale differentiates contracture from spasticity whereas the Ashworth Scale is confounded by it , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[23]  M. Morris,et al.  Outcomes of progressive resistance strength training following stroke: a systematic review , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  B. Bobath.  Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[25]  N. Lannin.  Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  B. Franklin,et al.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.