Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research.

The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.

[1]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[2]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Browndye: A software package for Brownian dynamics , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[3]  King H. Yang,et al.  Development of numerical models for injury biomechanics research: a review of 50 years of publications in the Stapp Car Crash Conference. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[4]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Data reuse and the open data citation advantage , 2013, PeerJ.

[5]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[7]  Jiahui Chen,et al.  Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  Russ B. Altman,et al.  Simbios: an NIH national center for physics-based simulation of biological structures , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Benjamin J. Ellis,et al.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Computational modeling of arterial biomechanics: insights into pathogenesis and treatment of vascular disease. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  Jill S Higginson,et al.  Changes in the activation and function of the ankle plantar flexor muscles due to gait retraining in chronic stroke survivors , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Jeffrey A Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Michael J. Holst,et al.  High-order finite element methods for cardiac monodomain simulations , 2015, Front. Physiol..

[14]  R A Brand,et al.  Cell mechanics. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[16]  R. Ogden,et al.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Eli J Weinberg,et al.  On the multiscale modeling of heart valve biomechanics in health and disease , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[18]  Antonie J. van den Bogert,et al.  A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  Jordi Alastruey,et al.  A benchmark study of numerical schemes for one‐dimensional arterial blood flow modelling , 2015, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[20]  Marcus G Pandy,et al.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Shayn M Peirce,et al.  Multiscale computational models of complex biological systems. , 2013, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[23]  Juan R Cebral,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics in brain aneurysms , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[24]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model for Muscle-Driven Simulation of Human Gait , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  M. Riel-Mehan,et al.  cellPACK: A Virtual Mesoscope To Model and Visualize Structural Systems Biology , 2015 .

[26]  Alison L. Marsden,et al.  SimVascular: An Open Source Pipeline for Cardiovascular Simulation , 2017, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  J. Higginson,et al.  Change in knee contact force with simulated change in body weight , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[28]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Four decades of finite element analysis of orthopaedic devices: where are we now and what are the opportunities? , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Philippe K Zysset,et al.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images , 2016, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[30]  E. Kuhl,et al.  Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities , 2015, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[31]  Farshid Guilak New tools for Content Innovation and data sharing: Enhancing reproducibility and rigor in biomechanics research. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Bridging scales through multiscale modeling: a case study on protein kinase A , 2015, Front. Physiol..

[33]  Steve A Maas,et al.  FEBio: History and Advances. , 2017, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[34]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Mechanics, mechanobiology, and modeling of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Jeffrey A. Reinbolt,et al.  Commentary on the Integration of Model Sharing and Reproducibility Analysis to Scholarly Publishing Workflow in Computational Biomechanics , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Open Knee: Open Source Modeling and Simulation in Knee Biomechanics , 2015, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[37]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Considerations for reporting finite element analysis studies in biomechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  D M Pierce,et al.  Automated hexahedral meshing of knee cartilage structures – application to data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2017, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[39]  Suvranu De,et al.  Towards immersive virtual reality (iVR): a route to surgical expertise , 2015, Journal of computational surgery.

[40]  B. Koopman,et al.  A subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[41]  Dorothy Beckett,et al.  Reproducibility of research in biophysics. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Mark Aberdour A people-focused , 2022 .

[43]  Neil W. Bressloff,et al.  Design Optimisation of Coronary Artery Stent Systems , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  Paul J. Rullkoetter,et al.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis. , 2016, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[46]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Institutional and individual influences on scientists' data sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis , 2013, ASIST.

[47]  A. Erdemir,et al.  Chondrocyte Deformations as a Function of Tibiofemoral Joint Loading Predicted by a Generalized High-Throughput Pipeline of Multi-Scale Simulations , 2012, PloS one.

[48]  K. Burrowes,et al.  Towards a virtual lung: multi-scale, multi-physics modelling of the pulmonary system , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.