Modeling the dynamics of distribution, extent, and NPP of global terrestrial ecosystems in response to future climate change

Abstract Understanding how terrestrial ecosystems would respond to future climate change can substantially contribute to scientific evaluation of the interactions between vegetation and climate. To reveal the future climate impacts might on the nature and magnitude of global vegetation, the spatiotemporal distribution and net primary productivity (NPP) of global terrestrial biomes and their dynamics in this century were quantitatively simulated and compared by using the improved Comprehensive and Sequential Classification System and the segmentation model. The 33 general circulation models under the four scenarios of Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) were utilized to simulate the future climate change. The multi-model ensemble results showed that at the global scale, the distribution of forests and deserts would expand by more than  2% and 4% over this century, respectively. By contrast, more than  11% of grassland regions would shrink. Despite the considerable differences in the simulated responses of the biomes, the poleward movement or expansion of temperate forest were prominent features across all the scenarios. Meanwhile, the terrestrial NPP was projected to increase by 7.44, 9.51, 9.46, and 12.02 Pg DW·a− 1 in 2070s relative to 1970s in the RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5, respectively. The largest NPP decrease would occur in tundra & alpine steppe. NPP in the Tropical Zone, the North Temperate Zone, and the North Frigid Zone was estimated to increase in this century, whereas NPP in the South Temperate Zone was projected to decrease slightly across all scenarios. Overall, ecosystems in the mid-/high latitudes would be more vulnerable to future climate change in terms of distribution ranges and primary productivity despite the existing uncertainties. Some vegetation would benefit from the warmer and wetter climate. However, most of these plants would suffer and experience irreversible changes, particularly in the northern hemisphere.

[1]  Guest Editorial: Global change effects on landscape and regional patterns of plant diversity , 1999 .

[2]  D. Beerling,et al.  Responses of Amazonian ecosystems to climatic and atmospheric carbon dioxide changes since the last glacial maximum. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  P. Valdes,et al.  A new global biome reconstruction and data‐model comparison for the Middle Pliocene , 2008 .

[4]  Bernard Tychon,et al.  Studying interactions between climate variability and vegetation dynamic using a phenology based approach , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[5]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[6]  Jizhou Ren,et al.  A grassland classification system and its application in China , 2008 .

[7]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States , 2003 .

[8]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[9]  F. Woodward Climate and plant distribution , 1987 .

[10]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[11]  A. Ito,et al.  Uncertainty of Concentration–Terrestrial Carbon Feedback in Earth System Models* , 2014 .

[12]  F. Kienast,et al.  A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland , 1993 .

[13]  Tiangang Liang,et al.  Modelling global-scale potential grassland changes in spatio-temporal patterns to global climate change , 2013 .

[14]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  The effects of fragmentation and disturbance of rainforest on ground‐dwelling small mammals on the Robertson Plateau, New South Wales, Australia , 1996, Journal of Biogeography.

[15]  Andy Jarvis,et al.  Downscaling Global Circulation Model Outputs: The Delta Method Decision and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 1 , 2010 .

[16]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  INCORPORATING DYNAMIC VEGETATION COVER WITHIN GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS , 2000 .

[17]  Jianlong Li,et al.  Assessing the Spatiotemporal Variation in Distribution, Extent and NPP of Terrestrial Ecosystems in Response to Climate Change from 1911 to 2000 , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  S. Prince,et al.  NPP Multi-Biome: Global Primary Production Data Initiative Products, R2 , 2013 .

[19]  Bernard L. Kovalchik,et al.  Forest habitat types of Montana. , 1977 .

[20]  A. Anav,et al.  Sensitivity of natural vegetation to climate change in the Euro-Mediterranean area , 2011 .

[21]  F. Biermann Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research , 2007 .

[22]  S. Shiyatov,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of forest-tundra communities in the polar urals , 2005, Russian Journal of Ecology.

[23]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Climate Variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate , 2000 .

[24]  M. Araújo,et al.  The concept of potential natural vegetation: an epitaph? , 2010 .

[25]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[26]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[27]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[28]  H. Seino,et al.  Agroclimatic Evaluation of Net Primary Productivity of Natural Vegetations , 1985 .

[29]  A. Fischlin,et al.  Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services , 2007 .

[30]  Tianxiang Yue,et al.  Surface modelling of global terrestrial ecosystems under three climate change scenarios , 2011 .

[31]  G. Bonan,et al.  Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate , 1992, Nature.

[32]  Guiling Wang,et al.  Future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on a dynamic vegetation model driven with RCP8.5 climate projections from 19 GCMs , 2014, Climatic Change.

[33]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[34]  D. Moser,et al.  Benefits and costs of controlling three allergenic alien species under climate change and dispersal scenarios in Central Europe. , 2016 .

[35]  L. Hughes Climate change and Australia: Trends, projections and impacts , 2003 .

[36]  Chris D. Jones,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedbacks under stabilization: uncertainty and observational constraints , 2006 .

[37]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[38]  W. Knorr,et al.  A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[40]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Feedbacks of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Climate Change , 2007 .

[41]  R. Betts Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo , 2000, Nature.

[42]  H. Xie,et al.  Changes in global potential vegetation distributions from 1911 to 2000 as simulated by the Comprehensive Sequential Classification System approach , 2012 .

[43]  R. Duncan,et al.  Endemism, species selection and the origin and distribution of the vascular plant flora of New Zealand , 2001 .

[44]  P. Wookey Experimental approaches to predicting the future of tundra plant communities , 2008 .

[45]  M. Howden,et al.  Vegetation thickening in an ecological perspective: significance to national greenhouse gas inventories , 2001 .

[46]  Tiangang Liang,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics on the distribution, extent, and net primary productivity of potential grassland in response to climate changes in China , 2013 .

[47]  R. Knutti,et al.  Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections , 2013 .

[48]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[49]  S. Gerber,et al.  Sensitivity of a dynamic global vegetation model to climate and atmospheric CO2 , 2004 .

[50]  Guiling Wang,et al.  Impact of CO2 concentration changes on the biosphere-atmosphere system of West Africa , 2002 .

[51]  F. Woodward,et al.  Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change , 1998, Nature.

[52]  Guogang Zhang,et al.  Effect of climate change over the past half century on the distribution, extent and NPP of ecosystems of Inner Mongolia , 2011 .

[53]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Terrestrial vegetation redistribution and carbon balance under climate change , 2006, Carbon balance and management.

[54]  L. Holdridge Determination of World Plant Formations From Simple Climatic Data. , 1947, Science.

[55]  S. Veloz,et al.  Vulnerability of biodiversity hotspots to global change , 2014 .

[56]  Guiling Wang,et al.  Potential future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on climate projections by eight general circulation models , 2008 .

[57]  Thomas Giesecke,et al.  Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model , 2012 .

[58]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[59]  S. Zerbe Potential natural vegetation: validity and applicability in landscape planning and nature conservation , 1998 .

[60]  David Pollard,et al.  Potential high‐latitude vegetation feedbacks on CO2‐induced climate change , 1999 .

[61]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Emission Scenarios , 2001 .