Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users

This study examines the factors that influence mobile learning adoption among Chinese university students. China’s higher education market is large and mobile device ownership is considered a status symbol. Combined, these two factors suggest mobile learning could have a big impact in China. From the literature, we identified three major areas that may affect behavioral intention to adopt mobile learning in this context: pedagogical, personal, and social. A 27-item survey was administered online to 292 students at a northern Chinese university. Exploratory factor analysis was used to measure the reliability and validity of the survey items. Path analysis was then used to test the hypotheses in the proposed mobile learning acceptance model. Findings indicate that pedagogical factors have the greatest effect on students’ behavioral intention to adopt mobile learning. Social influences, especially social image and subjective norm, also play a role. Personal innovativeness was not found to be a main factor, although it has some indirect influences.

[1]  Maria Luisa Sevillano-García,et al.  The Impact of Digital Mobile Devices in Higher Education , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  June Lu,et al.  Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Florence Martin,et al.  Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[7]  Chang Liu,et al.  Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[10]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[12]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  Andrina Granic,et al.  Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[14]  Clayton Shepard,et al.  You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him learn: Smartphone use in higher education , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  Marguerite Koole,et al.  A Model for Framing Mobile Learning , 2009 .

[17]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users , 2003 .

[19]  Shuang Hao,et al.  Intentionally mobile pedagogy: the M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education , 2014 .

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[23]  Roger Bateman,et al.  Smartphones Give You Wings: Pedagogical Affordances of Mobile Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[24]  Yen-Chun Jim Wu,et al.  Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Lung-Hsiang Wong,et al.  What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Michael M. Grant,et al.  Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[27]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Muhammad Ghulam,et al.  The impact of m-learning technology on students and educators , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  How the mobile communication markets differ in China, the U.S., and Europe , 2005, CACM.

[30]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  K. Nield Questioning the myth of the Chinese learner , 2004 .

[32]  Glenn Stockwell,et al.  Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning , 2008, ReCALL.

[33]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Engin Kursun,et al.  Key instructional design issues in a cellular phone-based mobile learning project , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Haoyang Che,et al.  An exposition of the crucial issues in China's educational informatization , 2005 .

[36]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[37]  LeMai Nguyen,et al.  iPads in higher education - Hype and hope , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[38]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  Jaeki Song,et al.  An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Richard Harper,et al.  Configuring the Mobile User: Sociological and Industry Views , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[41]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[42]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme,et al.  How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[43]  Manuel Castro,et al.  New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[44]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[45]  Magdalena Mateescu,et al.  Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme,et al.  Semi-formal learning communities for professional development in mobile learning , 2008, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[47]  Mike Levy,et al.  Learning Italian via mobile SMS , 2005 .

[48]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[49]  Fu Lee Wang,et al.  Investigating Acceptance towards Mobile Learning in Higher Education Students , 2015 .

[50]  Tiffany A. Koszalka,et al.  Literature on the safe and disruptive learning potential of mobile technologies , 2010 .

[51]  Xinran Y. Lehto,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Technologies for Chinese Consumers , 2007 .

[52]  E. O’Sullivan Transformative Learning: Educational Vision for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[53]  Dick Ng'ambi,et al.  Effective and ineffective uses of emerging technologies: Towards a transformative pedagogical model , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[54]  Ran Wei,et al.  Lifestyles and new media: adoption and use of wireless communication technologies in China , 2006, New Media Soc..

[55]  Paul Kim,et al.  Socioeconomic strata, mobile technology, and education: a comparative analysis , 2011 .

[56]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..