Paying attention to binding: Further studies assessing the role of reduced attentional resources in the associative deficit of older adults

The present experiments investigated whether the observed associative deficit in older adults’ episodic memory is mediated by a reduction of attentional resources. Using a dual-task procedure, younger and older participants studied lists of word pairs either under full attention or while performing a concurrent task. Both experiments showed that dividing attention did not cause a greater impairment to memory for associations than to memory for items in either age group. Furthermore, an analysis of concurrent task performance revealed that older adults’ attentional costs for both learning and binding items were not larger than for learning items alone, relative to younger adults. These data provide support for a multicausal interpretation of older adults’ memory deficits in which common, depleted attentional resources may be a mechanism that reduces memory for components of an episode in both older and younger adults under divided attention at encoding. In addition, older adults have a unique deficit in memory for the associations between the components, which does not seem to be resource dependent.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Age-related reductions in human recognition memory due to impaired encoding. , 1995, Science.

[2]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[4]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Chapter Five Cognition and Aging: A Theory of New Learning and the Use of Old Connections , 1990 .

[5]  L. Hasher,et al.  Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. , 1994 .

[6]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Aging Neuromodulation Impairs Associative Binding , 2005, Psychological science.

[8]  J. M. Puckett,et al.  Adult age differences in recognition memory for a nonsemantic attribute. , 1980, Experimental aging research.

[9]  E. Cooper,et al.  Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and Cognitive Deficits , 1982 .

[11]  Thomas M. Hess,et al.  Aging and cognition : knowledge organization and utilization , 1990 .

[12]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Paul Verhaeghen,et al.  Production deficiency hypothesis revisited: Adult age differences in strategy use as a function of processing resources , 1994 .

[14]  M. Naveh-Benjamin Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A processing resource account of age differences in recall. , 1982 .

[16]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The associative memory deficit of older adults: further support using face-name associations. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[17]  B. Weber,et al.  Human hippocampus establishes associations in memory , 1997, Hippocampus.

[18]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The associative memory deficit of older adults: the role of strategy utilization. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[19]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system , 1993 .

[20]  J. Curtis,et al.  Episodic Memory and the Hippocampus: It's About Time , 2003 .

[21]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Aging and reflective processes of working memory: binding and test load deficits. , 2000 .

[22]  U. Bayen,et al.  Age-related differences in the use of contextual information in recognition memory: a global matching approach. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[23]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[24]  Marcia K. Johnson MEM: Mechanisms of Recollection , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  On the Binding of Associations in Memory: Clues From Studies on the Role of the Hippocampal Region in Paired-Associate Learning , 1995 .

[26]  Faith M. Gunning-Dixon,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive aging: evidence from structural magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[27]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[28]  M. D. Murphy,et al.  Age differences in free recall rehearsal strategies. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[29]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Older adults’ associative deficit in episodic memory: Assessing the role of decline in attentional resources , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  F. Craik,et al.  Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding- and Retrieval-Related Brain Activity: A PET Study of Younger and Older Adults , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The hippocampus as an associator of discontiguous events , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  F. Craik,et al.  Presenting and analyzing results in aging research: a methodological note. , 1998, Experimental aging research.

[34]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[35]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[36]  E. Glisky,et al.  Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem? , 2001 .

[37]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: Further support for an asymmetry , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[38]  F. Blanchard-Fields,et al.  Unwanted thought: age differences in the correction of social judgements. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[39]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Role of attention in face encoding , 1994 .

[40]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Neural Activity during Item and Temporal-Order Memory Retrieval: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[42]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[43]  H. Buschke,et al.  Age differences in cognitive effort in recall. , 1983, Journal of gerontology.

[44]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging , 1991 .

[45]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. , 1994 .

[47]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  Gurindar S. Sohi,et al.  Memory systems , 1996, CSUR.

[49]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .

[50]  F. I. M. Craik Functional aspects of human memory - On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory , 1983 .

[51]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Age dissociates recency and lag recency effects in free recall. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  The Effects of Aging on the Recognition of Different Types of Associations , 2005, Experimental aging research.

[53]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[54]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Aging and deficits in associative memory: what is the role of strategy production? , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[55]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  An individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences: age-related differences in associative learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Cohesion Failure as a Source of Memory Illusions , 1996 .

[57]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  The neuropsychology of memory and aging. , 1992 .

[59]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Aging and contextual binding: Modeling recency and lag recency effects with the temporal context model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  F. Craik,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[61]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Adult age differences in episodic memory: further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.