Technology and Safety on Urban Roadways: The Role of ITS for WSDOT

This report examines the relationship between Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and safety from an urban perspective. Existing urban ITS are either system-level or site-level applications. System-level ITS, such as freeway management systems or traffic signal networks, address safety concerns only indirectly. These systems are designed to improve traffic flows and thus indirectly reduce collisions caused by congestion. Other system-level ITS used to increase the efficiency of transit, commercial vehicle operations, and emergency service operations also benefit safety indirectly. Site-level ITS applications, such as railroad/highway grade crossing warnings or work zone systems, are installed to directly address safety concerns. However, these applications are limited to specific locations identified as hazardous. Most urban crashes in Washington involve multiple vehicle collisions caused by driver error at locations that have not been identified as hazardous. Future ITS known as collision avoidance systems (CAS) hold considerable promise for urban roadway safety because these in-vehicle devices will inform drivers of judgment errors and can do so at many locations along an urban roadway system. A handful of ITS applications are so well tested that they can be aggressively pursued by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) as tools to reduce urban crashes. Most of these applications include the various systems, such as ramp meters and incident detection, used for freeway management. Other ITS safety applications, while promising, still need to be fully documented and are best used as demonstration applications. Most of these applications involve sensor technology used to warn drivers about road and roadside hazards at specific sites. The greatest safety benefit from ITS may come from in-vehicle collision warning systems. These applications should evolve from a number of large federal research projects and private industry initiatives that are under way. Given their potential impact on safety, WSDOT should monitor applications of these projects.

[1]  L Saxton ASSESSMENT OF ITS SAFETY BENEFITS , 1996 .

[2]  A Smiley,et al.  OVERVIEW AND METHODOLOGIES OF THE ITS SAFETY EVALUATION PROCESS , 1996 .

[3]  E D Bullimore PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION : MOTORISTS SHOULD NOT BE THE ONLY COMMUNITY TO BENEFIT FROM TECHNOLOGIES FOR MOBILITY : THOSE ON FOOT WILL BE SAFER AND FASTER WITH PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY CROSSINGS , 1998 .

[4]  Jennifer Nee,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF MOTORIST AID CALL BOXES IN WASHINGTON , 1996 .

[5]  B Boucke,et al.  BEST FOOT FORWARD: SAFER CROSSINGS FOR PEDESTRIANS , 1997 .

[6]  James Robinson,et al.  RAMP METERING STATUS IN NORTH AMERICA. , 1989 .

[7]  Jun Shibata GENERAL TRENDS OF ITS IN THE WORLD : KEY TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC SAFETY , 1998 .

[8]  Susan Scott,et al.  SAFETY IN OUR HANDS : AN OVERVIEW OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND HUMAN FACTORS TECHNOLOGIES , 1997 .

[9]  D Deeter,et al.  TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL TRANSPORTATION: "SIMPLE SOLUTIONS" , 1997 .

[10]  Traffic Safety Programs Addressing the safety issues related to younger and older drivers : a report to Congress, January 19, 1993 on the research agenda of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , 1993 .

[11]  W G Najm,et al.  BENEFITS ESTIMATION FOR SELECTED COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[12]  K C Henry,et al.  SIX-YEAR FLOW EVALUATION , 1989 .

[13]  Julia K Wilkie VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEMS ON URBAN FREEWAYS : REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 1998 .

[14]  Peter Samuel MAGNETIC STRIPS MAKE SNOW PLOUGHS SMARTER , 1997 .

[15]  Eugene Farber,et al.  REDUCING MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES THROUGH TECHNOLOGY , 1995 .

[16]  R G Hughes APPLYING ITS CONCEPTS TO PEDESTRIAN REQUIREMENTS , 1997 .

[17]  T Van Vuren,et al.  Urban congestion caused by incidents , 1994 .

[18]  Alexiadis,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL TO ASSESS THE SAFETY IMPACTS OF IMPLEMENTING IVHS USER SERVICES , 1994 .

[19]  Myung-Soon Chang CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF EXPOSURE MEASURES FOR EVALUATING HIGHWAY SAFETY , 1982 .

[20]  A S McKnight,et al.  Evaluation of Emerging Technologies for Traffic Crash Reporting , 1998 .

[21]  Jack D. Jernigan Expected Safety Benefits Of Implementing Intelligent Transportation Systems In Virginia: A Synthesis Of The Literature , 1998 .

[22]  Peter Schatz COMPANION FOR THE ROAD : AN ADVANCED ROADSIDE WARNING SYSTEM , 1998 .

[23]  Nels Ericson PUTTING A STOP TO RED-LIGHT RUNNERS , 1998 .