Reducing railway track settlement using three-dimensional polyurethane polymer reinforcement of the ballast

Abstract This paper presents the measured settlement results of full-scale testing of unreinforced and polymer reinforced ballast railway track under laboratory conditions, using the GRAFT I (Geopavement and Railways Accelerated Fatigue Testing) facility to show the significant reduction in track settlement that can be obtained using in-situ ballast reinforcement techniques. The measured settlement profile of each track specimen is monitored up to a maximum of 500,000 load cycles at different load levels and formation conditions, ranging from a subgrade Young’s modulus of 25–51 MPa. The results of a 3-dimensional polyurethane ballasted track reinforcement technique called XiTRACK, at an equivalent axle load of 44.4 tonnes, are then directly compared to the unreinforced settlement profile using developed settlement models from the tests. The polymer treated track is observed to reduce permanent track settlement by 99%, effectively giving slab-track like performance. The free draining properties of the formed GeoComposite are also highlighted. The paper concludes by presenting and commenting on, the application of the technique to real UK Switch & Crossing sites on the West Coast Main Line and at Clapham Junction. In the former case, at Points 215D, the application of the technique eliminated the need for track maintenance over the 10 year operating cycle at axle loads of 25 tonne and main line speeds of 125 mph confirming the measured laboratory observations.

[1]  Christian Madshus,et al.  HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY LINES ON SOFT GROUND: DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR AT CRITICAL TRAIN SPEED , 2000 .

[2]  L. Auersch.  Train induced ground vibrations: different amplitude-speed relations for two layered soils , 2012 .

[3]  M. Shenton.  Ballast deformation and track deterioration , 1985 .

[4]  Peter Keith Woodward,et al.  Cost Effective Solution of Persistent Track Faults Using XiTRACK GeoComposite Technology , 2005 .

[5]  Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of the Geogauge and Light Falling Weight Deflectometer as Construction Control Tools , 2005 .

[6]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Resilient modulus for fine-grained subgrade soils , 1994 .

[7]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Maintaining absolute clearances in ballasted railway tracks using in situ three-dimensional polyurethane GeoComposites , 2012 .

[8]  Lutz Auersch,et al.  The excitation of ground vibration by rail traffic: theory of vehicle–track–soil interaction and measurements on high-speed lines , 2005 .

[9]  Peter Keith Woodward,et al.  Geocomposite technology: reducing railway maintenance , 2007 .

[10]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Application of in situ polyurethane geocomposite beams to improve the passive shoulder resistance of railway track , 2012 .

[11]  Christian Madshus,et al.  PREDICTION MODEL FOR LOW FREQUENCY VIBRATION FROM HIGH SPEED RAILWAYS ON SOFT GROUND , 1996 .

[12]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  The experimental validation of a numerical model for the prediction of railway induced vibrations , 2006 .

[13]  Andreas Lundqvist,et al.  Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers , 2005 .

[14]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Cumulative plastic deformation for fine-grained subgrade soils , 1996 .

[15]  Tore Dahlberg,et al.  Some railroad settlement models—A critical review , 2001 .

[16]  Michael Burrow,et al.  A comparison of railway track foundation design methods , 2007 .

[17]  Matthew W. Frost,et al.  CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS ON CLAY SUBGRADES FOR ANALYTICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN , 2004 .

[18]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  A laboratory study on improvement of railway ballast and formation using geosynthetics , 2004 .

[19]  B. V. Brodrick,et al.  The Nottingham railway test facility, UK , 2007 .

[20]  Geert Degrande,et al.  FREE FIELD VIBRATIONS DURING THE PASSAGE OF A THALYS HIGH-SPEED TRAIN AT VARIABLE SPEED , 2001 .

[21]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  A full-scale laboratory investigation into railway track substructure performance and ballast reinforcement , 2011 .

[22]  Dingqing Li,et al.  METHOD FOR RAILROAD TRACK FOUNDATION DESIGN. I: DEVELOPMENT , 1998 .

[23]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[24]  M. Evans,et al.  SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING RELATIONSHIPS FOR GRAVELS , 1998 .

[25]  William Powrie,et al.  Determination of Dynamic Track Modulus from Measurement of Track Velocity during Train Passage , 2009 .

[26]  William Powrie,et al.  Measurements of transient ground movements below a ballasted railway line , 2010 .

[27]  Meysam Banimahd,et al.  Advanced finite element modelling of coupled train-track systems : a geotechnical perspective , 2008 .

[28]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Railway track performance study using a new testing facility , 2012 .

[29]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  Influences of Track Structure, Geometry and Traffic Parameters on Railway Deterioration , 2007 .

[30]  David Chapman,et al.  Investigation of railway track subgrade. I: In-situ assessment , 2003 .

[31]  Hirokazu Takemiya,et al.  Simulation of track-ground vibrations due to a high-speed train: the case of X-2000 at Ledsgard , 2003 .