A brief history of error

[1]  J. Millar,et al.  Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[2]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2011, Current Biology.

[3]  Avram Hershko,et al.  p31comet promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  J. Pines,et al.  Evidence for how APC-C-Cdc20 changes its substrate specificity in mitosis , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  Tamir Gonen,et al.  Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments , 2010, Nature.

[6]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Phosphorylation of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates its conformational transition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Levan.  THE EFFECT OF COLCHICINE ON ROOT MITOSES IN ALLIUM , 2010 .

[8]  A. Hershko,et al.  ATP is required for the release of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome from inhibition by the mitotic checkpoint , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Peters,et al.  Structure of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Interacting with a Mitotic Checkpoint Complex , 2009, Science.

[10]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[11]  Jeremy Minshull,et al.  The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  J. Rizo,et al.  p31comet Blocks Mad2 Activation through Structural Mimicry , 2007, Cell.

[13]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  The Mad2 Conformational Dimer: Structure and Implications for the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2007, Cell.

[14]  N. Morrice,et al.  Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is required for the spindle checkpoint response to lack of tension at kinetochores. , 2007, Genes & development.

[15]  E. Salmon,et al.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  K. Hardwick,et al.  Mad3 KEN Boxes Mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 Turnover, and Are Critical for the Spindle Checkpoint , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  A. Hershko,et al.  Inhibitory factors associated with anaphase-promoting complex/cylosome in mitotic checkpoint , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  A. Murray,et al.  Anaphase Inactivation of the Spindle Checkpoint , 2006, Science.

[19]  A. Ciliberto,et al.  In Vitro FRAP Identifies the Minimal Requirements for Mad2 Kinetochore Dynamics , 2006, Current Biology.

[20]  S. Biggins,et al.  Glc7/Protein Phosphatase 1 Regulatory Subunits Can Oppose the Ipl1/Aurora Protein Kinase by Redistributing Glc7 , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[21]  L. Nezi,et al.  Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31comet , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[22]  R. Karess,et al.  Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[23]  A. Murray,et al.  The Centromeric Protein Sgo1 Is Required to Sense Lack of Tension on Mitotic Chromosomes , 2005, Science.

[24]  J. Rizo,et al.  Conformation‐specific binding of p31comet antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[25]  E. Salmon,et al.  Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells , 2004, Current Biology.

[26]  J Wade Harper,et al.  Doc1 mediates the activity of the anaphase‐promoting complex by contributing to substrate recognition , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[27]  Tomohiro Matsumoto,et al.  Identification of a MAD2‐binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[29]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora Kinase-INCENP) Complex Promotes Chromosome Bi-orientation by Altering Kinetochore-Spindle Pole Connections , 2002, Cell.

[30]  E. Salmon,et al.  Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  A. Murray,et al.  The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. , 2001, Genes & development.

[32]  A. Murray,et al.  Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast , 2001, Current Biology.

[33]  G. Chan,et al.  Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2 , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Tim Hunt,et al.  Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome–Dependent Proteolysis of Human Cyclin a Starts at the Beginning of Mitosis and Is Not Subject to the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  A. Amon,et al.  A Mechanism for Coupling Exit from Mitosis to Partitioning of the Nucleus , 2000, Cell.

[36]  Rong Li,et al.  Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  A. Murray,et al.  The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. , 1999, Genes & development.

[38]  M. Kirschner,et al.  The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. , 1998, Genes & development.

[39]  A. Murray,et al.  Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[40]  Tomohiro Matsumoto,et al.  Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[41]  A. Murray,et al.  Activation of the Budding Yeast Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Without Mitotic Spindle Disruption , 1996, Science.

[42]  T. Hunt,et al.  The ‘destruction box’ of cyclin A allows B‐type cyclins to be ubiquitinated, but not efficiently destroyed. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[43]  A Khodjakov,et al.  The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  S. Artavanis-Tsakonas,et al.  The Drosophila cell cycle gene fizzy is required for normal degradation of cyclins A and B during mitosis and has homology to the CDC20 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint , 1995, Nature.

[46]  C. Rieder,et al.  Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  A. Murray,et al.  A MAP kinase-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts , 1994, Cell.

[48]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast , 1991, Cell.

[49]  B. Roberts,et al.  S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function , 1991, Cell.

[50]  M. Dasso,et al.  Completion of DNA replication is monitored by a feedback system that controls the initiation of mitosis in vitro: Studies in Xenopus , 1990, Cell.

[51]  A. Murray,et al.  Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle. , 1989, Science.

[52]  L. Hartwell,et al.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1988, Science.

[53]  R C Weisenberg,et al.  Microtubule Formation in vitro in Solutions Containing Low Calcium Concentrations , 1972, Science.

[54]  R. Nicklas,et al.  CHROMOSOME MICROMANIPULATION , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  E. Taylor,et al.  ISOLATION OF A PROTEIN SUBUNIT FROM MICROTUBULES , 1967, The Journal of cell biology.

[56]  H. N. Barber,et al.  The effects of cold and colchicine on mitosis in the newt , 1943, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[57]  W. E. Dixon.  A Manual of Pharmacology , 1936, Nature.

[58]  A. Desai,et al.  Molecular architecture of the kinetochore–microtubule interface , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[59]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[60]  J. Oppenheimer,et al.  Foundations of experimental embryology , 1964 .