MEDICAL DEVICES EARLY ASSESSMENT METHODS: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Objectives: The aim of this study was to get an overview of current theory and practice in early assessments of medical devices, and to identify aims and uses of early assessment methods used in practice. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in September 2013, using computerized databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus), and references list search. Selected articles were categorized based on their type, objective, and main target audience. The methods used in the application studies were extracted and mapped throughout the early stages of development and for their particular aims. Results: Of 1,961 articles identified, eighty-three studies passed the inclusion criteria, and thirty were included by searching reference lists. There were thirty-one theoretical papers, and eighty-two application papers included. Most studies investigated potential applications/possible improvement of medical devices, developed early assessment framework or included stakeholder perspective in early development stages. Among multiple qualitative and quantitative methods identified, only few were used more than once. The methods aim to inform strategic considerations (e.g., literature review), economic evaluation (e.g., cost-effectiveness analysis), and clinical effectiveness (e.g., clinical trials). Medical devices were often in the prototype product development stage, and the results were usually aimed at informing manufacturers. Conclusions: This study showed converging aims yet widely diverging methods for early assessment during medical device development. For early assessment to become an integral part of activities in the development of medical devices, methods need to be clarified and standardized, and the aims and value of assessment itself must be demonstrated to the main stakeholders for assuring effective and efficient medical device development.

[1]  R. Goeree,et al.  Health technology assessment and primary data collection for reducing uncertainty in decision making. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  Ian Robinson,et al.  User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. , 2006, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[3]  T. Nelson,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Walter G. Park,et al.  How to value technological innovation: a proposal for determining relative clinical value. , 2013, Gastroenterology.

[5]  Mika Immonen,et al.  Telecare services for aging people: Assessment of critical factors influencing the adoption intention , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Morgan E. Lim,et al.  Health technology assessment for radiologists: basic principles and evaluation framework. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[7]  Kees Lokhorst,et al.  Wireless-accessible sensor populations for monitoring biological variables , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  G. Rakhorst,et al.  Medical Technology Assessment: The use of the Analytic Hierarchy process as a Tool for Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Medical Devices , 2000, The International journal of artificial organs.

[9]  B. Reimer,et al.  Older Adult Perceptions of Smart Home Technologies: Implications for Research, Policy & Market Innovations in Healthcare , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Tracy Merlin,et al.  WHAT’S IN A NAME? DEVELOPING DEFINITIONS FOR COMMON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PRODUCT TYPES OF THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF AGENCIES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (INAHTA) , 2014, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[11]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Why do some promising brain-stimulation devices fail the next steps of clinical development? , 2010, Expert review of medical devices.

[12]  C. Schmuland,et al.  Value-added medical-device risk management , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability.

[13]  Jordan Paradise,et al.  Exploring Emerging Nanobiotechnology Drugs and Medical Devices , 2008, Food and drug law journal.

[14]  Susanne Hartz,et al.  Contribution of economic evaluation to decision making in early phases of product development: A methodological and empirical review , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[15]  D. Baumgart Personal digital assistants in health care: experienced clinicians in the palm of your hand? , 2005, The Lancet.

[16]  Mark Speechley,et al.  Health Technologies for Monitoring and Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Review , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[17]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis , 2011, Medical devices.

[18]  Richard J. Lilford,et al.  Investing in new medical technologies: A decision framework , 2007 .

[19]  Joseph F. Clark,et al.  Time-critical neurological emergencies: the unfulfilled role for point-of-care testing , 2010, International journal of emergency medicine.

[20]  T. Flynn,et al.  USING BEST-WORST SCALING IN HORIZON SCANNING FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA TECHNOLOGIES , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  D. McCready,et al.  Technology as a force for improved diagnosis and treatment of breast disease. , 2010, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[22]  Gimon de Graaf,et al.  A method for the early health technology assessment of novel biomarker measurement in primary prevention programs , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  L. Ballini,et al.  A method for addressing research gaps in HTA, developed whilst evaluating robotic-assisted surgery: a proposal , 2010, Health research policy and systems.

[24]  Ben M Clopton,et al.  Technology and the Future of Cochlear Implants , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[25]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A preliminary economic evaluation of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Ultrawideband Technology in Medicine: A Survey , 2012, J. Electr. Comput. Eng..

[27]  A. Smale,et al.  Medical technology horizon scanning , 2005, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[28]  H. Sigmund,et al.  “The future should not take us by surprise”: Preparation of an early warning system in Denmark , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[29]  Laura Vallejo-Torres,et al.  Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: A Bayesian approach , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[30]  M. Drummond,et al.  Early dialogue between the developers of new technologies and pricing and reimbursement agencies: a pilot study. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[31]  David R. Jones,et al.  Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[32]  J. John,et al.  Public Health Policy Decisions on Medical Innovations: What Role Can Early Economic Evaluation Play? , 2009, Health policy.

[33]  Enrique J. Gómez,et al.  HIS modelling and simulation based cost-benefit analysis of a telemedical system for closed-loop diabetes therapy , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[34]  Michael J Lambert,et al.  Computer-supported monitoring of patient treatment response. , 2004, Journal of clinical psychology.

[35]  N. Staggers,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Designs of Clinical Technology: Findings and Recommendations for Future Research , 2009, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[36]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  Technological Invention to Product Innovation: A Project Management Approach , 2010 .

[37]  J. Rinehart,et al.  Innovative technologies applied to anesthesia: how will they impact the way clinicians practice? , 2012, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[38]  Reem Al-Nanih,et al.  Characterising Context for Mobile User Interfaces in Health Care Applications , 2012, ANT/MobiWIS.

[39]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Reasoning about diabetes and its relationship to the use of telecommunication technology by patients and physicians , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[40]  Janna Marchien A NEW PARADIGM OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT , 2001 .

[41]  M. Drummond,et al.  Challenges in the clinical and economic evaluation of medical devices: The case of transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2011 .

[42]  Edgardo Abalos,et al.  The tools and techniques of evidence-based medicine. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[43]  Ram Datar,et al.  Rapid, label-free, electrical whole blood bioassay based on nanobiosensor systems. , 2011, ACS nano.

[44]  Noel E Schaeffer The Role of Human Factors in the Design and Development of an Insulin Pump , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[45]  Zion Tsz Ho Tse,et al.  The case for MR‐compatible robotics: a review of the state of the art , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[46]  Eiji Okamoto,et al.  Blood compatible design of a pulsatile blood pump using computational fluid dynamics and computer-aided design and manufacturing technology. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[47]  Abbas Azari,et al.  Computer‐assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes—a review , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[48]  E. Jordan,et al.  Horizon scanning of new and emerging medical technology in Australia: Its relevance to Medical Services Advisory Committee health technology assessments and public funding , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[49]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Innovation in the medical device sector: an open business model approach for high-tech small firms , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[50]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Predicting the health economic performance of new non‐fusion surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[51]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Assessment of the technology for functional imaging in cancer. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[52]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Early Bayesian modeling of a potassium lab-on-a-chip for monitoring of heart failure patients at increased risk of hyperkalaemia , 2012 .

[53]  O. Tal,et al.  EARLY AWARENESS AND ALERT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ISRAEL , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[54]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[55]  W. Rogowski,et al.  Clearing up the hazy road from bench to bedside: A framework for integrating the fourth hurdle into translational medicine , 2008, BMC health services research.

[56]  L. Gervais,et al.  Microfluidic Chips for Point‐of‐Care Immunodiagnostics , 2011, Advanced materials.

[57]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Patient Preferences for Next Generation Neural Prostheses to Restore Bladder Function , 2010, Spinal Cord.

[58]  Karl Claxton,et al.  An Iterative Bayesian Approach to Health Technology Assessment: Application to a Policy of Preoperative Optimization for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[59]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[60]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  Bridging two translation gaps: A new informatics research agenda for telemonitoring of chronic disease , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[61]  D. Sretavan,et al.  Microtechnology in medicine: the emergence of surgical microdevices. , 2007, Clinical neurosurgery.

[62]  Kiyotaka Fukamachi,et al.  New technologies for mechanical circulatory support: current status and future prospects of CorAide and MagScrew technologies , 2004, Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs.

[63]  Valesca P Retèl,et al.  Scenario drafting to anticipate future developments in technology assessment , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[64]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Review of health information technology usability study methodologies , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[65]  Morgan E. Lim,et al.  Health technology assessment from a Canadian device industry perspective. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[66]  F. Taketani,et al.  Characteristics of spherical aberrations in 3 aspheric intraocular lens models measured in a model eye , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[67]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Closed-loop insulin delivery: from bench to clinical practice , 2011, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[68]  G. Santler,et al.  The Graz hemisphere splint: a new precise, non-invasive method of replacing the dental arch of 3D-models by plaster models. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[69]  D. Malone,et al.  Evaluation of a Wireless Handheld Medication Management Device in the Prevention of Drug-Drug Interactions in a Medicaid Population , 2012, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[70]  D. K. Cullen,et al.  Biomedical engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair: surgical applications, state of the art, and future challenges. , 2011, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[71]  Richard Lilford,et al.  Early-stage valuation of medical devices: the role of developmental uncertainty. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[72]  Hilary Martin,et al.  Technology roadmap development process (TRDP) for the service sector: A conceptual framework , 2012 .

[73]  T. Brodtkorb Cost-effectiveness analysis of health technologies when evidence is scarce , 2010 .

[74]  Theo J. B. M. Postma,et al.  The future of imaging techniques for cancer patients in The Netherlands , 2006, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[75]  Edward J. Dougherty An Evidence-Based Model Comparing the Cost-effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel to Alternative Therapies for Patients with Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers , 2008, Advances in skin & wound care.

[76]  V. Heaslip,et al.  Wireless technology in the evolution of patient monitoring on general hospital wards , 2010, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[77]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies , 2008 .

[78]  An Jacobs,et al.  A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: A case in the homecare field , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[79]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Co-evolutionary scenarios: An application to prospecting futures of the responsible development of nanotechnology , 2009 .

[80]  Brent Edwards,et al.  The Future of Hearing Aid Technology , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[81]  Janet Reis,et al.  An e-Learning Caregiving Program for Prostate Cancer Patients and Family Members , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.

[83]  Mala Bridgelal Ram,et al.  Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[84]  Ned L. Kirsch,et al.  Assistive Technologies for Cognitive Disabilities , 2005 .

[85]  S. Micera,et al.  Gerontechnology , 2021, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[86]  Karl Claxton,et al.  Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: a review and application of methods. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[87]  Donald A Berry,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian methods III: use and interpretation of Bayesian tools in design and analysis , 2005, Clinical trials.

[88]  T Schleyer,et al.  Advancing oral medicine through informatics and information technology: a proposed framework and strategy. , 2011, Oral diseases.

[89]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[90]  Scanning the horizon of obsolete technologies: Possible sources for their identification , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[91]  Carolyn J. Green,et al.  Beyond effectiveness: the evaluation of information systems using a comprehensive health technology assessment framework , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[92]  Claudia Wild,et al.  Emerging health technologies: informing and supporting health policy early. , 2008, Health policy.

[93]  Vasanthi Srinivasan,et al.  Ethical issues in health care sector in India , 2013 .

[94]  M Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Early technology assessment of new medical devices , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[95]  Wija Oortwijn,et al.  Priority setting for horizon scanning of new health technologies in Denmark: views of health care stakeholders and health economists. , 2006, Health policy.

[96]  Peter Wood,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness analysis at the development phase of a potential health technology: examples based on tissue engineering of bladder and urethra , 2007, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[97]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access , 2011, Applied health economics and health policy.

[98]  Valesca P Retèl,et al.  Review on early technology assessments of nanotechnologies in oncology , 2009, Molecular oncology.

[99]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  Experimental assessment of precision and accuracy of radiostereometric analysis for the determination of polyethylene wear in a total hip replacement model , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[100]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies , 2013 .

[101]  Rory Cooper Quality-of-Life Technology [A Human-Centered and Holistic Design] , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[102]  Joseph P Lane,et al.  Modeling technology innovation: How science, engineering, and industry methods can combine to generate beneficial socioeconomic impacts , 2012, Implementation Science.

[103]  Donald G Robertson,et al.  Metabolomics in toxicology: preclinical and clinical applications. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[104]  Jennifer L. Martin,et al.  The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[105]  Sandro Carrara,et al.  Nano-Bio-Technology and Sensing Chips: New Systems for Detection in Personalized Therapies and Cell Biology , 2010, Sensors.

[106]  Cummings Cw Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl]. , 1978 .

[107]  M. Drummond,et al.  Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? , 2006, Health economics.

[108]  S. Bailey,et al.  Nanotechnology in cardiovascular medicine , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[109]  R Lilford,et al.  Keeping pace with new technologies: systems needed to identify and evaluate them , 1999, BMJ.

[110]  S Najarian,et al.  Advances in medical robotic systems with specific applications in surgery—a review , 2011, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[111]  J. Lavee,et al.  Mechanical alternatives to the human heart: future devices. , 2002, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[112]  Martin Buxton,et al.  Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[113]  Paolo Pertile An extension of the real option approach to the evaluation of health care technologies: the case of positron emission tomography , 2008, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics.

[114]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Medical nanorobotics for diabetes control. , 2008, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[115]  Clifford S. Goodman,et al.  Methodological approaches of health technology assessment , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[116]  Lex M Bouter,et al.  Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice. , 2002, Health policy.

[117]  D. Krewski,et al.  Thermal therapy, Part III: ablation techniques. , 2007, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[118]  H. Bosworth,et al.  Medication adherence: emerging use of technology , 2011, Current opinion in cardiology.

[119]  M. Drummond,et al.  The Iterative Use of Economic Evaluation as Part of the Process of Health Technology Assessment , 1997, Journal of health services research & policy.

[120]  Stefan Weber,et al.  Computer-assisted liver surgery: clinical applications and technological trends. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[121]  J. Gore,et al.  Changes in dietary iron exacerbate regional brain manganese accumulation as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[122]  Collaboration between academia, manufacturers and healthcare services for development and adoption of medical devices with regard to costs and effects , 2009 .

[123]  D. Kor,et al.  New technologies in pediatric anesthesia , 2012, Paediatric anaesthesia.