Someone to blame: When identifying a victim decreases helping

People's willingness to contribute (WTC) more resources to save the lives of identified victims than to save anonymous or statistical victims is known as the identifiable victim effect. Previous research suggested that the emotional arousal (empathy and distress) toward a single identified victim is a major source of the effect. However, identification of a single target may also strengthen negative perceptions (like blame) in situations where the target is perceived as responsible for his/her plight. In five studies (collecting real contributions and hypothetical WTC) we show that identifying a person in need may increase or decrease helping depending on the perceived responsibility of the victim for his/her own plight. Our results suggest that in cases when it is possible to blame the victim, identification of a single target enhances negative perceptions of the victim and decreases helping, especially when the perceiver holds strong beliefs in a just world for others.

[1]  I. Siegler,et al.  The belief in a just world and perceptions of discrimination. , 1993, The Journal of psychology.

[2]  P. Heaven,et al.  Belief in a just world and attitudes toward AIDS sufferers. , 1990, The Journal of social psychology.

[3]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[4]  Lawrence E. Jones,et al.  Risk perception and victim perception: The judgment of HIV cases , 1996 .

[5]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations , 2005 .

[6]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving individuals and groups: expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Tehila Kogut.  The role of perspective taking and emotions in punishing identified and unidentified wrongdoers , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[8]  M. Lerner,et al.  Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world , 1998 .

[9]  L. Bègue,et al.  Two spheres of belief in justice: extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. , 2003, Journal of personality.

[10]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. , 2007 .

[11]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion , 1980 .

[12]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Attentional mechanisms in the generation of sympathy , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[13]  L. Montada.  Belief in a Just World: A Hybrid of Justice Motive and Self-Interest? , 1998 .

[14]  M. Lerner,et al.  Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": compassion or rejection? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Laurent Bègue,et al.  Beliefs in justice and faith in people: just world, religiosity and interpersonal trust , 2002 .

[16]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving persons and groups. , 1996, Psychological review.

[17]  Jeffrey W. Sherman,et al.  Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions - eScholarship , 1999 .

[18]  David A. Lishner,et al.  Altruism and helping behavior , 2003 .

[19]  M. Zuckerman.  Belief in a just world and altruistic behavior. , 1975 .

[20]  B. Weiner.  A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving. , 1980 .

[21]  B. Weiner.  Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Theories of Motivation from an Attributional Perspective , 2000 .

[22]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability , 2003 .

[23]  B. Philip,et al.  Models of Helping and Coping. , 1982 .

[24]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Just world beliefs and attitudes towards the poor. , 1984 .

[25]  Isaac M. Lipkus,et al.  The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale , 1991 .

[26]  Joe C Magee,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Power and Perspectives Not Taken , 2022 .

[27]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Who believes in a just world , 1975 .

[28]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[29]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[30]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The devil you know: the effects of identifiability on punishment , 2005 .

[31]  Renate Klein,et al.  Evidence for the Altruistic Personality from Data on Accident Research , 1991 .

[32]  Gilbert Geis,et al.  Bystander Intervention Into Crime: A Study Based on Naturally-Occurring Episodes , 1981 .

[33]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. , 1978 .

[34]  C. Dalbert,et al.  The Importance of Distinguishing the Belief in a Just World for Self Versus for Others: Implications for Psychological Well-Being , 1996 .

[35]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[36]  L. Bègue,et al.  Altruistic behavior and the bidimensional just world belief. , 2008, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[38]  Tehila Kogut.  Public decisions or private decisions? When the specific case guides public decisions , 2009 .

[39]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  "One of us": Outstanding willingness to help save a single identified compatriot , 2007 .

[40]  L. Montada,et al.  How Do Observers of Victimization Preserve Their Belief in a Just World Cognitively or Actionally , 1998 .